Literature DB >> 20731518

The perceptual experience of slope by foot and by finger.

Alen Hajnal1, Daniel T Abdul-Malak, Frank H Durgin.   

Abstract

Historically, the bodily senses have often been regarded as impeccable sources of spatial information and as being the teacher of vision. Here, the authors report that the haptic perception of slope by means of the foot is greatly exaggerated. The exaggeration is present in verbal as well as proprioceptive judgments. It is shown that this misperception of pedal slope is not caused by calibration to the well-established visual misperception of slope because it is present in congenitally blind individuals as well. The pedal misperception of slope is contrasted with the perception of slope by dynamic touch with a finger in a force-feedback device. Although slopes feel slightly exaggerated even when explored by finger, they tend to show much less exaggeration than when equivalent slopes are stood on. The results are discussed in terms of a theory of coding efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20731518     DOI: 10.1037/a0019950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Use your head! Perception of action possibilities by means of an object attached to the head.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Alen Hajnal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Depth compression based on mis-scaling of binocular disparity may contribute to angular expansion in perceived optical slant.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The social psychology of perception experiments: hills, backpacks, glucose, and the problem of generalizability.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Brennan Klein; Ariana Spiegel; Cassandra J Strawser; Morgan Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Getting off on the right (or left) foot: perceiving by means of a rod attached to the preferred or non-preferred foot.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Alen Hajnal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Counterpoint.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-03

8.  Manual anchoring biases in slant estimation affect matches even for near surfaces.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Eric McManama; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

9.  On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Emily Sun; Cassandra J Strawser; Ariana Spiegel; Brennan Klein; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Large perceptual distortions of locomotor action space occur in ground-based coordinates: Angular expansion and the large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion.

Authors:  Brennan J Klein; Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.