Literature DB >> 20731510

Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems.

Jane Leighton1, Cecilia Heyes.   

Abstract

The effector dependence of automatic imitation was investigated using a stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) procedure during which participants were required to make an open or closed response with their hand or their mouth. The correct response for each trial was indicated by a pair of letters in Experiments 1 and 2 and by a colored square in Experiment 3. Each of these imperative stimuli was accompanied by task-irrelevant action images depicting a hand or mouth opening or closing. In relation to the response, the irrelevant stimulus was movement compatible or movement incompatible, and effector compatible or effector incompatible. A movement compatibility effect was observed for both hand and mouth responses. These movement compatibility effects were present when the irrelevant stimulus was effector compatible and when it was effector incompatible, but were smaller when the irrelevant stimulus and response effectors were incompatible. Consistent with the associative sequence learning (ASL) model of imitation, these findings indicate that automatic imitation is partially effector dependent and therefore that the effector dependence of intentional imitation reflects, at least in part, the nature of the mechanisms that mediate visuomotor translation for imitation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20731510     DOI: 10.1037/a0019953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

2.  Automatic imitation in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Generalization of motor resonance during the observation of hand, mouth, and eye movements.

Authors:  Alessandra Finisguerra; Laura Maffongelli; Michela Bassolino; Marco Jacono; Thierry Pozzo; Alessandro D'Ausilio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents' gestures.

Authors:  Richard Cook; Geoffrey Bird; Gabriele Lünser; Steffen Huck; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Priming of hand and foot response: is spatial attention to the body site enough?

Authors:  Alison J Wiggett; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

7.  Facilitation and interference in spatial and body reference frames.

Authors:  Alison J Wiggett; Paul E Downing; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perseveration effects in reaching and grasping rely on motor priming and not perception.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Grasping with the foot: goal and motor expertise in action observation.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Nadia Bolognini; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  From movement kinematics to social cognition: the case of autism.

Authors:  Jennifer Cook
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.