Literature DB >> 20730039

Three-Dimensional Carotid Plaque Progression Simulation Using Meshless Generalized Finite Difference Method Based on Multi-Year MRI Patient-Tracking Data.

Chun Yang1, Dalin Tang, Satya Atluri.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is becoming the number one cause of death worldwide. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture and progression are closely related to most severe cardiovascular syndromes such as heart attack and stroke. Mechanisms governing plaque rupture and progression are not well understood. A computational procedure based on three-dimensional meshless generalized finite difference (MGFD) method and serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was introduced to quantify patient-specific carotid atherosclerotic plaque growth functions and simulate plaque progression. Participating patients were scanned three times (T1, T2, and T3, at intervals of about 18 months) to obtain plaque progression data. Vessel wall thickness (WT) changes were used as the measure for plaque progression. Since there was insufficient data with the current technology to quantify individual plaque component growth, the whole plaque was assumed to be uniform, homogeneous, isotropic, linear, and nearly incompressible. The linear elastic model was used. The 3D plaque model was discretized and solved using a meshless generalized finite difference (GFD) method. Four growth functions with different combinations of wall thickness, stress, and neighboring point terms were introduced to predict future plaque growth based on previous time point data. Starting from the T2 plaque geometry, plaque progression was simulated by solving the solid model and adjusting wall thickness using plaque growth functions iteratively until T3 is reached. Numerically simulated plaque progression agreed very well with the target T3 plaque geometry with errors ranging from 11.56%, 6.39%, 8.24%, to 4.45%, given by the four growth functions. We believe this is the first time 3D plaque progression simulation based on multi-year patient-tracking data was reported. Serial MRI-based progression simulation adds time dimension to plaque vulnerability assessment and will improve prediction accuracy for potential plaque rupture risk.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20730039      PMCID: PMC2923413     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci        ISSN: 1526-1492            Impact factor:   1.593


  16 in total

1.  Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress.

Authors:  D N Ku; D P Giddens; C K Zarins; S Glagov
Journal:  Arteriosclerosis       Date:  1985 May-Jun

2.  Local maximal stress hypothesis and computational plaque vulnerability index for atherosclerotic plaque assessment.

Authors:  Dalin Tang; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Joseph D Petruccelli; Gregorio A Sicard; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Meshless Generalized Finite Difference Method and Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression Simulation Using Multi-Year MRI Patient-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Dalin Tang; Chun Yuan; William Kerwin; Fei Liu; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Satya Atluri
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.593

Review 4.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  The role of fluid mechanics in the localization and detection of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D P Giddens; C K Zarins; S Glagov
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  In Vivo/Ex Vivo MRI-Based 3D Non-Newtonian FSI Models for Human Atherosclerotic Plaques Compared with Fluid/Wall-Only Models.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Dalin Tang; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 1.593

Review 7.  MRI of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Relation of vessel wall shear stress to atherosclerosis progression in human coronary arteries.

Authors:  C M Gibson; L Diaz; K Kandarpa; F M Sacks; R C Pasternak; T Sandor; C Feldman; P H Stone
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb       Date:  1993-02

Review 9.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.

Authors:  Christine M Scotti; Alexander D Shkolnik; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patient-Specific Carotid Plaque Progression Simulation Using 3D Meshless Generalized Finite Difference Models with Fluid-Structure Interactions Based on Serial In Vivo MRI Data.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Dalin Tang; Satya Atluri
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.593

2.  Computer simulation of three-dimensional plaque formation and progression in the carotid artery.

Authors:  Nenad Filipovic; Zhongzhao Teng; Milos Radovic; Igor Saveljic; Dimitris Fotiadis; Oberdan Parodi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  MRI-based patient-specific human carotid atherosclerotic vessel material property variations in patients, vessel location and long-term follow up.

Authors:  Qingyu Wang; Gador Canton; Jian Guo; Xiaoya Guo; Thomas S Hatsukami; Kristen L Billiar; Chun Yuan; Zheyang Wu; Dalin Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Structural modelling of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Benjamin Owen; Nicholas Bojdo; Andrey Jivkov; Bernard Keavney; Alistair Revell
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-06-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.