Literature DB >> 21927582

Patient-Specific Carotid Plaque Progression Simulation Using 3D Meshless Generalized Finite Difference Models with Fluid-Structure Interactions Based on Serial In Vivo MRI Data.

Chun Yang1, Dalin Tang, Satya Atluri.   

Abstract

Previously, we introduced a computational procedure based on three-dimensional meshless generalized finite difference (MGFD) method and serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to quantify patient-specific carotid atherosclerotic plaque growth functions and simulate plaque progression. Structure-only models were used in our previous report. In this paper, fluid-stricture interaction (FSI) was added to improve on prediction accuracy. One participating patient was scanned three times (T1, T2, and T3, at intervals of about 18 months) to obtain plaque progression data. Blood flow was assumed to laminar, Newtonian, viscous and incompressible. The Navier-Stokes equations with arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation were used as the governing equations. Plaque material was assumed to be uniform, homogeneous, isotropic, linear, and nearly incompressible. The linear elastic model was used. The 3D FSI plaque model was discretized and solved using a meshless generalized finite difference (GFD) method. Growth functions with a) morphology alone; b) morphology and plaque wall stress (PWS); morphology and flow shear stress (FSS), and d) morphology, PWS and FSS were introduced to predict future plaque growth based on previous time point data. Starting from the T2 plaque geometry, plaque progression was simulated by solving the FSI model and adjusting plaque geometry using plaque growth functions iteratively until T3 is reached. Numerically simulated plaque progression agreed very well with the target T3 plaque geometry with errors ranging from 8.62%, 7.22%, 5.77% and 4.39%, with the growth function including morphology, plaque wall stress and flow shear stress terms giving the best predictions. Adding flow shear stress term to the growth function improved the prediction error from 7.22% to 4.39%, a 40% improvement. We believe this is the first time 3D plaque progression FSI simulation based on multi-year patient-tracking data was reported. Serial MRI-based progression simulation adds time dimension to plaque vulnerability assessment and will improve prediction accuracy for potential plaque rupture risk.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21927582      PMCID: PMC3171744     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci        ISSN: 1526-1492            Impact factor:   1.593


  25 in total

1.  Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress.

Authors:  D N Ku; D P Giddens; C K Zarins; S Glagov
Journal:  Arteriosclerosis       Date:  1985 May-Jun

2.  Three-Dimensional Carotid Plaque Progression Simulation Using Meshless Generalized Finite Difference Method Based on Multi-Year MRI Patient-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Dalin Tang; Satya Atluri
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.593

3.  Local maximal stress hypothesis and computational plaque vulnerability index for atherosclerotic plaque assessment.

Authors:  Dalin Tang; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Joseph D Petruccelli; Gregorio A Sicard; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Prediction of sites of coronary atherosclerosis progression: In vivo profiling of endothelial shear stress, lumen, and outer vessel wall characteristics to predict vascular behavior.

Authors:  Peter H Stone; Ahmet Umit Coskun; Yerem Yeghiazarians; Scott Kinlay; Jeffrey J Popma; Richard E Kuntz; Charles L Feldman
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Meshless Generalized Finite Difference Method and Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression Simulation Using Multi-Year MRI Patient-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Dalin Tang; Chun Yuan; William Kerwin; Fei Liu; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Satya Atluri
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.593

Review 6.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The role of fluid mechanics in the localization and detection of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D P Giddens; C K Zarins; S Glagov
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 8.  MRI of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.

Authors:  Christine M Scotti; Alexander D Shkolnik; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  3 in total

1.  Participants Switching to Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy with Susceptible Virus Display Inferior Adherence and Worse Outcomes: An Observational Analysis.

Authors:  Lentlametse Mantshonyane; Jason Roy; Michael Z Levy; Carole L Wallis; Kathrine Bar; Catherine Godfrey; Ann Collier; Alberto LaRosa; Lu Zheng; Xin Sun; Robert Gross
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.944

2.  Upregulation of the Long Noncoding RNA CASC10 Promotes Cisplatin Resistance in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Ricardo Noriega-Rivera; Mariela Rivera-Serrano; Robert J Rabelo-Fernandez; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Fatima Valiyeva; Pablo E Vivas-Mejía
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Analyses of Biological Systems Using Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics.

Authors:  Milan Toma; Rosalyn Chan-Akeley; Jonathan Arias; Gregory D Kurgansky; Wenbin Mao
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.