Literature DB >> 20729446

Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening.

Ganesh R Veerappan1, Mazer R Ally, Jong-Ho R Choi, Jennifer S Pak, Corinne Maydonovitch, Roy K H Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of extracolonic findings when screening is undertaken by CT colonography (CTC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients completing a screening CTC from August 2003 to June 2006 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Extracolonic findings were categorized using a CTC reporting and data system that classifies findings as highly significant, likely significant, and insignificant. All final diagnoses, surgeries, malignancies, and costs of diagnostic radiology procedures were calculated for each category.
RESULTS: Of 2,277 patients (mean +/- SD age, 59 +/- 11 years; 60% white; 56% male) undergoing CTC, extracolonic findings were identified in 1,037 (46%) patients, with 787 (34.5%) insignificant and 240 (11.0%) significant findings. Evaluation of significant findings generated 280 radiology procedures and 19 surgeries over a mean follow-up time of 19 +/- 10 months. The total cost of the radiology studies was $113,179; the studies added approximately $50 extra per patient. Seven high-risk lesions were identified (six extracolonic malignancies and one large aortic aneurysm) in patients with significant findings. CTC also identified six intracolonic malignancies and three adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. When considering extracolonic findings, CTC increased the odds of identifying high-risk lesions by 78% (nine intracolonic lesions vs 16 intracolonic plus extracolonic lesions; p = 0.0156). Of the 16 intracolonic and extracolonic high-risk lesions, 11 (69%) underwent curative resection, and 5 of 11 (44.4%) were extracolonic.
CONCLUSION: CTC increased the odds of identifying high-risk lesions by 78%. CTC should be considered as an alternative to optical colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or as a onetime procedure to identify significant treatable intracolonic and extracolonic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20729446     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  22 in total

1.  Incidental findings in emergency imaging: frequency, recommendations, and compliance with consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Haris Shekhani; Matthew E Zygmont; James Matthew Kerchberger; Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 2.  Evidence review and status update on computed tomography colonography.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

3.  Computer-aided detection of renal calculi from noncontrast CT images using TV-flow and MSER features.

Authors:  Jianfei Liu; Shijun Wang; Evrim B Turkbey; Marius George Linguraru; Jianhua Yao; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Laura D Scherer; Alec J Megibow; Leslie J Higuita; Nathanael Kim; R Scott Braithwaite; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Cost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Katrina Armstrong; Peter Groeneveld
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Computer-aided detection of exophytic renal lesions on non-contrast CT images.

Authors:  Jianfei Liu; Shijun Wang; Marius George Linguraru; Jianhua Yao; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Predictors of primary care provider adoption of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jennifer M Weiss; David H Kim; Maureen A Smith; Aaron Potvien; Jessica R Schumacher; Ronald E Gangnon; B Dustin Pooler; Patrick R Pfau; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-04

8.  Indeterminate but Likely Unimportant Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography (C-RADS Category E3): Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Suspected extracolonic neoplasms detected on CT colonography: literature review and possible outcomes.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Carolyn M Rutter; Abraham H Dachman; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.