Literature DB >> 20728112

Preoperative stone attenuation value predicts success after shock wave lithotripsy in children.

Sean McAdams1, Nicholas Kim, Daniel Dajusta, Manoj Monga, Indupur R Ravish, Rajendra Nerli, Linda Baker, Aseem R Shukla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined whether stone attenuation can predict stone fragmentation after shock wave lithotripsy in the pediatric population. Previous studies show that preoperative attenuation in HU on noncontrast computerized tomography predicts shock wave lithotripsy success. To our knowledge study of this parameter in the pediatric population has been lacking to date.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional review of the records of 53 pediatric patients 1 to 18 years old who underwent shock wave lithotripsy for 3.8 to 36.0 mm renal calculi. Stone size, average skin-to-stone distance and attenuation value were determined by bone windows on preoperative noncontrast computerized tomography. Success was defined as radiographically stone-free status at 2 to 12-week followup after a single lithotripsy session without the need for further sessions or ancillary procedures.
RESULTS: After lithotripsy 33 patients (62%) were stone-free and 20 had incomplete fragmentation or required additional procedures. Mean ± SD stone attenuation in successfully treated patients vs those with incomplete fragmentation was 710 ± 294 vs 994 ± 379 HU (p = 0.007). Logistical regression analysis revealed that only attenuation in HU was a significant predictor of success. When patients were stratified into 2 groups (less than 1,000 and 1,000 HU or greater), the shock wave lithotripsy success rate was 77% and 33%, respectively (p <0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Stone attenuation less than 1,000 HU is a significant predictor of shock wave lithotripsy success in the pediatric population. This finding suggests that attenuation values have a similar predictive value in the pediatric population as that previously reported in the adult population.
Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20728112     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Colleran; Michael J Callahan; Harriet J Paltiel; Caleb P Nelson; Bartley G Cilento; Michelle A Baum; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

2.  Predicting ESWL success by determination of Hounsfield unit on non-contrast CT is clinically irrelevant in children.

Authors:  Aykut Akinci; Cagri Akpinar; Muammer Babayigit; Murat Can Karaburun; Tarkan Soygur; Berk Burgu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Correlative investigation between routine clinical parameters of dual-energy computed tomography and the outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Beiwu Tu; Jianye Jia; Lengwei Yu; Huimin Li; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-10

4.  Unenhanced MDCT in suspected urolithiasis: improved stone detection and density measurements using coronal maximum-intensity-projection images.

Authors:  Michael T Corwin; Margaret Hsu; John P McGahan; Machelle Wilson; Ramit Lamba
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Dong Soo Kim; Sung Kyoung Moon; Sang Hyub Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.