Literature DB >> 35072732

Predicting ESWL success by determination of Hounsfield unit on non-contrast CT is clinically irrelevant in children.

Aykut Akinci1, Cagri Akpinar2, Muammer Babayigit3, Murat Can Karaburun3, Tarkan Soygur4, Berk Burgu4.   

Abstract

The necessity of determining stone density by non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a controversial topic due to the radiation exposure. We aimed to investigate whether stone density is helpful in predicting the success of ESWL in pediatric patients or not. In this retrospective study, database of a single center was used to identify 232 children aged between 2 and 16 years. Patients with abnormal renal anatomy, distal obstruction, a known cystine stone disease, a previous history of an intervention regarding stone, and an insufficient follow-up period (< 3 months) were excluded from the study. A total of 209 patients were included in the study (94 with NCCT, 115 without NCCT). Groups were compared in terms of stone size, stone location, and stone-free rate at 3 months after a single ESWL session. The mean age was 6.17 ± 3.27 years and 120 (57.4%) of the patients were male and 89 (42.6%) were female. Mean stone size was 11.7 mm in NCCT group and 12.3 mm in non-NCCT group (p 0.128). The complete stone clearance rate in NCCT and non-NCCT group at 3 months after ESWL was 57.4% (54/94) and 54.7% (63/115), respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference (p 0.316). In conclusion, unnecessary NCCT use should be avoided before ESWL considering the similar success rates after ESWL and the risk of exposure to radiation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; ESWL; Hounsfield unit; Stone

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35072732     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01306-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  16 in total

Review 1.  Shockwave lithotripsy: anecdotes and insights.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; Samuel C Kim; Ramsay L Kuo; James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Evaluation and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Pause and pulse: ten steps that help manage radiation dose during pediatric fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Marilyn J Goske; Ishtiaq H Bercha; Keith J Strauss
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Kent Kanao; Jun Nakashima; Ken Nakagawa; Hirotaka Asakura; Akira Miyajima; Mototsugu Oya; Takashi Ohigashi; Masaru Murai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ali Unsal; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Gokhan Atis; Zafer Tokatli; Derya Oztuna; Abdullah Armagan; Cenk Gurbuz; Turhan Caskurlu; Remzi Saglam
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Nomogram and scoring system for predicting stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis.

Authors:  Bulent Onal; Nejat Tansu; Oktay Demirkesen; Veli Yalcin; Lin Huang; Hiep T Nguyen; Bartley G Cilento; Ahmet Erozenci
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Outcome of small residual stone fragments following shock wave lithotripsy in children.

Authors:  Kourosh Afshar; Gordon McLorie; Frank Papanikolaou; Rowja Malek; Elizabeth Harvey; Joao L Pippi-Salle; Darius J Bagli; Antoine E Khoury; Walid Farhat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Harry Cullings; Akihiko Suyama; Sachiyo Funamoto; Nobuo Nishi; Midori Soda; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Kazunori Kodama; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Roy E Shore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Kidney stone size and hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed E Abou-El-Ghar; Bassam A Awad; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.