OBJECTIVES: We conducted a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a cervical cancer control intervention for Vietnamese American women that used lay health workers. METHODS: The study group included 234 women who had not received a Papanicolaou (Pap) test in the last 3 years. Experimental group participants received a lay health worker home visit. Our trial endpoint was Pap test receipt within 6 months of randomization. Pap testing completion was ascertained through women's self-reports and medical record reviews. We examined intervention effects among women who had ever received a Pap test (prior to randomization) and women who had never received a Pap test. RESULTS: Three quarters of the women in the experimental group completed a home visit. Ever-screened experimental group women were significantly more likely to report Pap testing (P < .02) and to have records verifying Pap testing (P < .04) than were ever-screened control group women. There were no significant differences between the trial arms for women who had never been screened. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that lay health worker-based interventions for Vietnamese American women are feasible to implement and can increase levels of Pap testing use among ever-screened women but not among never-screened women.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a cervical cancer control intervention for Vietnamese American women that used lay health workers. METHODS: The study group included 234 women who had not received a Papanicolaou (Pap) test in the last 3 years. Experimental group participants received a lay health worker home visit. Our trial endpoint was Pap test receipt within 6 months of randomization. Pap testing completion was ascertained through women's self-reports and medical record reviews. We examined intervention effects among women who had ever received a Pap test (prior to randomization) and women who had never received a Pap test. RESULTS: Three quarters of the women in the experimental group completed a home visit. Ever-screened experimental group women were significantly more likely to report Pap testing (P < .02) and to have records verifying Pap testing (P < .04) than were ever-screened control group women. There were no significant differences between the trial arms for women who had never been screened. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that lay health worker-based interventions for Vietnamese American women are feasible to implement and can increase levels of Pap testing use among ever-screened women but not among never-screened women.
Authors: Jeremiah Mock; Stephen J McPhee; Thoa Nguyen; Ching Wong; Hiep Doan; Ky Q Lai; Kim H Nguyen; Tung T Nguyen; Ngoc Bui-Tong Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Victoria M Taylor; T Gregory Hislop; J Carey Jackson; Shin-Ping Tu; Yutaka Yasui; Stephen M Schwartz; Chong Teh; Alan Kuniyuki; Elizabeth Acorda; Ann Marchand; Beti Thompson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephen J McPhee; Tung T Nguyen; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Carol Somkin; Phuong Vo; Rena Pasick Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Bruce D Rapkin; Elisa Weiss; David Lounsbury; Tamara Michel; Alexis Gordon; Jennifer Erb-Downward; Eilleen Sabino-Laughlin; Alison Carpenter; Carolyn E Schwartz; Linda Bulone; Margaret Kemeny Journal: Am J Community Psychol Date: 2017-09-15
Authors: Elisa K Tong; Tung T Nguyen; Penny Lo; Susan L Stewart; Ginny L Gildengorin; Janice Y Tsoh; Angela M Jo; Marjorie L Kagawa-Singer; Angela U Sy; Charlene Cuaresma; Hy T Lam; Ching Wong; Mi T Tran; Moon S Chen Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Peter C Raich; Elizabeth M Whitley; William Thorland; Patricia Valverde; Diane Fairclough Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kevin Fiscella; Elizabeth Whitley; Samantha Hendren; Peter Raich; Sharon Humiston; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Patricia Valverde; William Thorland; Ronald Epstein Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.254