Literature DB >> 21039042

Cost effectiveness of a program to promote screening for cervical cancer in the Vietnamese-American population.

John F Scoggins1, Scott D Ramsey, J Carey Jackson, Victoria M Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a lay health worker-administered cervical cancer screening intervention for Vietnamese-American women.
METHODS: The study group included 234 Vietnamese women in the Seattle, Washington area who had not received a Pap test in the last three years. Experimental group participants received a lay health worker home visit. The travel distance and time spent at each visit were recorded. Our trial end-point was Pap smear receipt within six months of randomization. Pap testing completion was ascertained through medical record reviews.
RESULTS: For all Vietnamese women, regardless of their prior history of screening, the cost per intervention was $104.0 (95% CI: $89.6-$118.4). The change in quality-adjusted life days per intervention was 1.26 (95% CI: -5.43-7.96), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $30,015 per quality-adjusted life year. The probability that the ICER exceeds $100,000 is 9.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of cost effectiveness of such interventions is sensitive to the assumed duration of behavioral change and the participants' prior history of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039042      PMCID: PMC3024547     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  21 in total

Review 1.  Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Andrew H Briggs; Bernie J O'Brien; Gordon Blackhouse
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  A method for constructing complete annual U.S. life tables.

Authors:  R N Anderson
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2000

3.  Costs and effectiveness of alternative strategies for cervical cancer screening in military beneficiaries.

Authors:  G Larry Maxwell; Jay W Carlson; Mark Ochoa; Tom Krivak; G Scott Rose; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.

Authors:  Scott Ramsey; Richard Willke; Andrew Briggs; Ruth Brown; Martin Buxton; Anita Chawla; John Cook; Henry Glick; Bengt Liljas; Diana Petitti; Shelby Reed
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  United States life tables, 2004.

Authors:  Elizabeth Arias
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2007-12-28

Review 6.  Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves--facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions.

Authors:  Elisabeth Fenwick; Bernie J O'Brien; Andrew Briggs
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values.

Authors:  M R Gold; P Franks; K I McCoy; D G Fryback
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Healthcare resource use and costs associated with cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancers in a large U.S. health plan.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Xin Ye; Puneet K Singhal; George W Carides
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S.

Authors:  Barry A Miller; Kenneth C Chu; Benjamin F Hankey; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Janet S Choi; Eunsuk Choi; Carrie L Nieman; Jin Hui Joo; Frank R Lin; Laura N Gitlin; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giridhar Mohan; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Donatus U Ekwueme; Susan A Sabatino; Devon L Okasako-Schmucker; Yinan Peng; Shawna L Mercer; Anilkrishna B Thota
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 4.  Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotte Kelly; Claire Hulme; Tracey Farragher; Graham Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  U.S. Vietnamese parents' HPV vaccine decision-making for their adolescents: an exploration of practice-, provider-, and patient-level influences.

Authors:  Milkie Vu; Robert A Bednarczyk; Cam Escoffery; Danny Ta; Victoria N Huynh; Carla J Berg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-18

6.  A General Pathway Model for Improving Health Disparities: Lessons from Community and Cultural Involvement in Improving Cervical Cancer Screening in Vietnamese Women.

Authors:  Richard Kones; Umme Rumana; Fauzia Arain
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.