Literature DB >> 20724391

Detecting breaches in defensive barriers using in situ simulation for obstetric emergencies.

William Riley1, Stan Davis, Kristi M Miller, Helen Hansen, Robert M Sweet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Reason's safety model, high-reliability healthcare organisations are characterised by multiple layers of defensive barriers in depth associated with increased levels of safety in the care delivery system. However, there is very little empirical evidence describing and defining defensive barriers in healthcare settings or systematic analysis documenting the nature of breaches in these barriers. This study uses in situ simulation to identify defensive barriers and classify the nature of active and latent breaches in these barriers.
METHODS: An in situ simulation methodology was used to study team performance during obstetrics emergencies. The authors conducted 46 trials of in situ simulated obstetrics emergencies in two phases at six different hospitals involving 823 physicians, nurses and support staff from January 2006 to February 2008. These six hospitals included a university teaching hospital, two suburban community hospitals and three rural hospitals. The authors created a high-fidelity simulation by developing scenarios based on actual sentinel events.
RESULTS: A total of 965 breaches were identified by participants in 46 simulation trials. Of the 965 breaches, 461 (47.8%) were classified as latent conditions, and 494 (51.2%) were classified as active failures.
CONCLUSIONS: In Reason's model, all sentinel events involve a breached protective layer. Understanding how protective layers breakdown is the first step to ensure patient safety and establish a high reliability. These findings suggest where to invest resources to help achieve a high reliability. In situ simulation helps recognise and remedy both active failures and latent conditions before they combine to cause bad outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20724391     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2010.040311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  14 in total

1.  The Tuscan Mobile Simulation Program: a description of a program for the delivery of in situ simulation training.

Authors:  Edward Ullman; Maura Kennedy; Francesco Dojmi Di Delupis; Paolo Pisanelli; Andrea Giuliattini Burbui; Meaghan Cussen; Laura Galli; Riccardo Pini; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Integrated Approach to Reduce Perinatal Adverse Events: Standardized Processes, Interdisciplinary Teamwork Training, and Performance Feedback.

Authors:  William Riley; James W Begun; Les Meredith; Kristi K Miller; Kathy Connolly; Rebecca Price; Janet H Muri; Mac McCullough; Stanley Davis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  In situ simulation as a tool for patient safety: a systematic review identifying how it is used and its effectiveness.

Authors:  Graham Fent; James Blythe; Omer Farooq; Makani Purva
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-11-09

4.  The use of in situ simulation to detect latent safety threats in paediatrics: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Marc Auerbach; David O Kessler; Mary Patterson
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-11-03

5.  Women's Experiences with Neuraxial Labor Analgesia in the Listening to Mothers II Survey: A Content Analysis of Open-Ended Responses.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Judy Jou; Marianne E McPherson; William Camann
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST).

Authors:  Mark Fan; Andrew Petrosoniak; Sonia Pinkney; Christopher Hicks; Kari White; Ana Paula Siquiera Silva Almeida; Douglas Campbell; Melissa McGowan; Alice Gray; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Bent Ottesen; Lars Konge; Peter Dieckmann; Cees Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees Van der Vleuten; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Charlotte Krebs Albrechtsen; Berit Woetman Pedersen; Hanne Kjærgaard; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Clarifying the learning experiences of healthcare professionals with in situ and off-site simulation-based medical education: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Laura Emdal Navne; Helle Max Martin; Bent Ottesen; Charlotte Krebs Albrecthsen; Berit Woetmann Pedersen; Hanne Kjærgaard; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees van der Vleuten; Susanne Rosthøj; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Liis Starkopf; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.