Literature DB >> 35515201

In situ simulation as a tool for patient safety: a systematic review identifying how it is used and its effectiveness.

Graham Fent1, James Blythe1, Omer Farooq1, Makani Purva1.   

Abstract

Background: In situ simulation is an emerging technique involving interdisciplinary teams working through simulated scenarios which replicate events encountered in healthcare institutions, particularly those which are either low frequency or associated with high risk to patients. Since it takes place in the clinical environment, it is ideally suited to improving patient safety outcomes. Objective: To identify and appraise all studies assessing contribution of in situ simulation to patient safety, identify gaps in knowledge and areas for future research, as well as suggesting strategies for maximising its impact on patient safety within an institution. Study selection: Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE) as well as the Cochrane Library were searched for articles relating to patient safety outcomes in in situ simulation. In addition a subject expert was approached to suggest any additional articles not identified by electronic searches. A total of 1795 abstracts were identified and screened, 35 full articles assessed for eligibility for inclusion and a total of 18 full articles included in the review after unsuitable articles were excluded. Conclusions: In situ simulation can improve real-life patient safety outcomes, with 2 studies demonstrating improved morbidity and mortality outcomes following initiation of in situ simulation. There is good evidence to suggest that its implementation leads to improved clinical skills, teamwork and observed behaviours. Additionally, it is ideally suited to detecting latent safety errors (errors identified within a scenario which, if they had occurred in real life, could have led to a degree of harm occurring to a patient). Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  in situ; patient safety; simulation

Year:  2015        PMID: 35515201      PMCID: PMC8936915          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  27 in total

1.  Patient safety and simulation-based medical education.

Authors:  A Ziv Stephen D Small Paul Root Wolpe
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies.

Authors:  Darcy Reed; Eboni G Price; Donna M Windish; Scott M Wright; Aysegul Gozu; Edbert B Hsu; Mary Catherine Beach; David Kern; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education.

Authors:  David A Cook; Georges Bordage; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Identification of latent safety threats using high-fidelity simulation-based training with multidisciplinary neonatology teams.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wetzel; Tara R Lang; Tiffany L Pendergrass; Regina G Taylor; Gary L Geis
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2013-06

5.  Mobile in situ obstetric emergency simulation and teamwork training to improve maternal-fetal safety in hospitals.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Nancy K Lowe; Shad Deering; Patricia O Lewis; Christen O'Haire; Lori K Irwin; Molly Blaser; Laurie S Wood; Barbara G Kanki
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-10

6.  In situ simulation training for paediatric cardiorespiratory arrest: initial observations and identification of latent errors.

Authors:  A L Garden; S A Mills; R Wilson; P Watts; J M Griffin; S Gannon; I Kapoor
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.669

7.  In situ simulation training for neonatal resuscitation: an RCT.

Authors:  Sophie Rubio-Gurung; Guy Putet; Sandrine Touzet; Hélène Gauthier-Moulinier; Isabelle Jordan; Anne Beissel; Jean-Marc Labaune; Sébastien Blanc; Nassira Amamra; Catherine Balandras; René-Charles Rudigoz; Cyrille Colin; Jean-Charles Picaud
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  A randomized, controlled trial of in situ pediatric advanced life support recertification ("pediatric advanced life support reconstructed") compared with standard pediatric advanced life support recertification for ICU frontline providers*.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kurosawa; Takanari Ikeyama; Patricia Achuff; Madeline Perkel; Christine Watson; Annemarie Monachino; Daphne Remy; Ellen Deutsch; Newton Buchanan; Jodee Anderson; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Using simulation to orient code blue teams to a new hospital facility.

Authors:  Frank J Villamaria; Jose F Pliego; Hania Wehbe-Janek; Neil Coker; M Hasan Rajab; Stephen Sibbitt; Paul E Ogden; Keith Musick; Jeff L Browning; Jennifer Hays-Grudo
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.929

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  Learning experience on sentinel cases of COVID-19 at a public healthcare institution: sharing on operating room processes.

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Keen-Chong Chau; Siok-Peng Ng; Li-Ming Teo; Sharon Gk Ong; Wai-Keong Wong; Biauw-Chi Ong; Min-Hoe Chew
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.331

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.