Literature DB >> 20718555

An experimental analysis of steady-state response rate components on variable ratio and variable interval schedules of reinforcement.

Phil Reed1.   

Abstract

Three experiments explored a novel approach to analyzing the different components of response rate that are produced by exposure to free-operant schedules of reinforcement. It has been suggested that overall response rate comprises a tendency to initiate responding, and to continue to respond once the bout is initiated. Previous post hoc analyses of interresponse times (IRT) data have suggested several features of these different aspects of responding that the current experimental procedure broadly confirmed. Increasing the size of a variable interval (VI) schedule decreases the number of "burst-initiation" responses, but has less effect on responding once the burst has been initiated (Experiment 1); that the major difference between a variable ratio (VR) schedule and a VI schedule, is not in the number of "burst-initiation" responses, but in the number of "within-burst" responses, with shorter interresponse times that are emitted, with greater numbers of such "within-burst" responses being emitted on a VR schedule (Experiments 2 and 3).

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20718555     DOI: 10.1037/a0019387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  13 in total

1.  The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Raul Garcia; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Extinction under a behavioral microscope: isolating the sources of decline in operant response rate.

Authors:  Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Human performance on random ratio and random interval schedules, performance awareness and verbal instructions.

Authors:  Ceri A Bradshaw; Gary Freegard; Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Contextual control of instrumental actions and habits.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  Procedure for preventing response strain on random interval schedules with a linear feedback loop.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  A bout analysis of operant response disruption.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 8.  A computational formulation of the behavior systems account of the temporal organization of motivated behavior.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Carter W Daniels; Tanya Gupta; Cristina Santos
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Extinction learning deficit in a rodent model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Katrina Herbst; Jade C Hill; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Characterizing operant hyperactivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat.

Authors:  Jade C Hill; Katrina Herbst; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.