Literature DB >> 33629243

Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.

Ryan J Brackney1,2, Raul Garcia1,3, Federico Sanabria4.   

Abstract

Operant behavior is organized in bouts that are particularly visible under variable-interval (VI) schedules of reinforcement. Previous research showed that increasing the work required to produce a response decreases the rate at which bouts are emitted and increases the minimum interresponse time (IRT). In the current study, the minimum effective IRT was directly manipulated by changing the minimum duration of effective lever presses reinforced on a VI 40-s schedule. Contrary to assumptions of previous models, response durations were variable. Response durations were typically 0.5 s greater than the minimum duration threshold; durations that exceeded this threshold were approximately log-normally distributed. As the required duration threshold increased, rats emitted fewer but longer bouts. This effect may reflect an effort-induced reduction in motivation and a duration-induced facilitation of a response-outcome association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bouts; Duration; Lever press; Rats; Refractory period; Variable interval

Year:  2021        PMID: 33629243     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-021-00464-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  32 in total

1.  Timing and the control of variation.

Authors:  A Gharib; S Derby; S Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-04

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The operant reserve: a computer simulation in (accelerated) real time.

Authors:  A Charles Catania
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Reinforcement schedules: the role of responses preceding the one that produces the reinforcer.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response duration is sensitive to both immediate and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Tom Byrne; Brianna Sarno
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Extinction under a behavioral microscope: isolating the sources of decline in operant response rate.

Authors:  Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Factors controlling the micro-structure of human free-operant behaviour: Bout-initiation and within-bout responses are effected by different aspects of the schedule.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Chen; Phil Reed
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  The distribution of response bout lengths and its sensitivity to differential reinforcement.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A bout analysis of operant response disruption.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.