Literature DB >> 2071636

Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure. A review of 276 cases.

C J Kershaw1, R M Atkins, C A Dodd, C J Bulstrode.   

Abstract

The results of 276 cemented revision total hip arthroplasties performed for aseptic failure between 1977 and 1986 have been reviewed. The mean time between revision and review was 75 months (range 30 to 144). Of 220 cases available for review, 159 were assessed clinically and radiographically, and 32 by postal questionnaire. Eighteen hips required further revision, 12 for loosening, two for sepsis, two for persistent pain, and one each for fracture and recurrent dislocation. A further six hips were radiologically and symptomatically loose. Pain was mild or absent in 83%. Over half were able to walk a mile or more; 70% flexed more than 70 degrees; 15% had a flexion deformity, but in only 7% was this more than 10 degrees. The mean Harris hip score was 74. Survival at five years was 95% and at 10 years, 77%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2071636     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  14 in total

1.  Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5-9 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Chen; James P Waddell; Jane Morton; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Total hip replacement: the way forward.

Authors:  C Bulstrode
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  C H Hartwig; P Böhm; U Czech; P Reize; W Küsswetter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems.

Authors:  Hyung-Gyu Jang; Kyung-Jae Lee; Byung-Woo Min; Hee-Uk Ye; Kyung-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  [Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M D Schofer; T Efe; T J Heyse; N Timmesfeld; R Velte; F Hinrichs; J Schmitt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Metal on metal hip resurfacing versus uncemented custom total hip replacement--early results.

Authors:  Nemandra A Sandiford; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood; John A Skinner; Jia Hua
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  High medium-term survival of Zweymüller SLR-plus stem used in femoral revision.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The Correlation of Serum Metal Ions with Functional Outcome Scores at Three-to-Six Years following Large Head Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sheethal Prasad Patange Subbarao; Ibrahim A Malek; Khitish Mohanty; Phillip Thomas; Alun John
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-03-27

10.  The course of radiographic loosening, pain and functional outcome around the first revision of a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Regula Teuscher; Michal Neukamp; Eu Jin Lee; Markus Melloh; Stefan Eggli; Christoph Röder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.