Literature DB >> 2071618

Survivorship analysis of the uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement.

C G Moran1, I M Pinder, T A Lees, M J Midwinter.   

Abstract

Ninety-six patients who had a total of 108 replacements with an uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee prosthesis were followed for an average of sixty-four months (range, thirty-nine to ninety-three months). At the time of the most recent follow-up, twenty-one implants (19 per cent) had failed, all due to problems with the tibial component. A patellar component was not used, and no noteworthy patellar problems were encountered after the operation. There were no infections about the prostheses, and no femoral implant was revised. The most common cause of failure was collapse of the anteromedial part of the tibial plateau, which occurred in fourteen knees. The prosthesis loosened without collapse of bone in two knees, and five knees were revised because of gross wear of the polyethylene. When the time of failure was defined as the point at which revision of the prosthesis was recommended, the cumulative rate of survival was 84 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, +/- 7 per cent) at five years and 77 +/- 10 per cent at six years. When the time of failure was defined as the point at which the knee replacement was actually done, the five-year rate of survival was the same. No significant differences were demonstrated between groups that were stratified by age, sex, weight, or primary diagnosis. We therefore do not recommend the use of an uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement of the design that was evaluated in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2071618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  8 in total

1.  Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers.

Authors:  Hongchuan Wang; Hua Lou; Huiwei Zhang; Junwei Jiang; Kai Liu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Early aseptic loosening of a porous tantalum knee prosthesis.

Authors:  D Tigani; G Sabbioni; A Raimondi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-11-06

3.  Clinical outcomes and survivorship of cementless triathlon total knee arthroplasties: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian J Carlson; Adam S Gerry; Jeffrey D Hassebrock; Zachary K Christopher; Mark J Spangehl; Joshua S Bingham
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Outcome analysis of total knee-replacements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Elke; G Meier; K Warnke; E Morscher
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award : No Difference in 2-year Functional Outcomes Using Kinematic versus Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Matthew L Walker; Ali Bayan; Toby Briant-Evans; Paul Pavlou; Bill Farrington
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Bone ingrowth in well-fixed retrieved porous tantalum implants.

Authors:  Josa A Hanzlik; Judd S Day
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Outcomes of a newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty design in patients less than 50 years of age.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Chukwuweike Gwam; Jared M Newman; Morad Chughtai; Anton Khlopas; Prem N Ramkumar; Steven F Harwin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Edward R Valstar; Klaas-Auke Nouta; Josepha Wm Plevier; Marta Fiocco; Saskia Middeldorp; Rob Ghh Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.