Literature DB >> 20714222

Deciphering the chromatin landscape induced around DNA double strand breaks.

Laurent Massip1, Pierre Caron, Jason S Iacovoni, Didier Trouche, Gaëlle Legube.   

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious forms of lesions and deciphering the details of the chromatin landscape induced around DSBs represents a great challenge for molecular biologists. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, followed by microarray hybridisation (ChIP-chip) or high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), are powerful techniques that provide high-resolution maps of protein-genome interactions. However, applying these techniques to study chromatin changes induced around DSBs was previously hindered due to a lack of suitable DSB induction techniques. We have recently developed an experimental system utilizing a restriction enzyme fused to a modified oestrogen receptor ligand binding domain (AsiSI-ER), which generates multiple, sequence-specific and unambiguously positioned DSBs across the genome upon induction with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT).(1) Cell lines expressing this construct represent a powerful tool to study specific chromatin changes during DSB repair, enabling high-resolution profiling of DNA repair complexes and chromatin modifications induced around DSBs. Using this system, we have recently produced the first map of gammaH2AX, a DSB-induced chromatin modification, on two human chromosomes and have investigated its spreading properties.(1) Here we provide additional data characterizing the cell lines, present a genome-wide profile of gammaH2AX obtained by ChIP-seq, and discuss the potential of our system towards investigations of previously uncharacterized aspects of DSB repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20714222     DOI: 10.4161/cc.9.15.12412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  30 in total

Review 1.  Histone phosphorylation: a chromatin modification involved in diverse nuclear events.

Authors:  Dorine Rossetto; Nikita Avvakumov; Jacques Côté
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  Quantifying DNA double-strand breaks induced by site-specific endonucleases in living cells by ligation-mediated purification.

Authors:  Catherine Chailleux; François Aymard; Pierre Caron; Virginie Daburon; Céline Courilleau; Yvan Canitrot; Gaëlle Legube; Didier Trouche
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Histone tails: Directing the chromatin response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  The DNA damage response: the omics era and its impact.

Authors:  Kasper W J Derks; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Joris Pothof
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-30

5.  A new method to efficiently induce a site-specific double-strand break in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Sham Sunder; Nikole T Greeson-Lott; Kurt W Runge; Steven L Sanders
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 6.  Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications.

Authors:  Sophie E Polo; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Targeting protein for xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) regulates γ-histone 2AX (γ-H2AX) levels upon ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Gernot Neumayer; Angela Helfricht; Su Yeon Shim; Hoa Thi Le; Cecilia Lundin; Camille Belzil; Mathieu Chansard; Yaping Yu; Susan P Lees-Miller; Oliver J Gruss; Haico van Attikum; Thomas Helleday; Minh Dang Nguyen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates DNA end resection in concert with Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) and ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM).

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Tanya T Paull
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  A meeting at risk: Unrepaired DSBs go for broke.

Authors:  Aude Guénolé; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.197

10.  Recruitment of KMT2C/MLL3 to DNA Damage Sites Mediates DNA Damage Responses and Regulates PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Cancer.

Authors:  Antao Chang; Liang Liu; Justin M Ashby; Dan Wu; Yanan Chen; Stacey S O'Neill; Shan Huang; Juan Wang; Guanwen Wang; Dongmei Cheng; Xiaoming Tan; W J Petty; Boris C Pasche; Rong Xiang; Wei Zhang; Peiqing Sun
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.