BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biomarker use for pancreatic cancer diagnosis has been impaired by a lack of samples suitable for reliable quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Fine needle aspirates (FNAs) from pancreatic masses were studied to define potential causes of RNA degradation and develop methods for accurately measuring gene expression. METHODS: Samples from 32 patients were studied. RNA degradation was assessed by using a multiplex PCR assay for varying lengths of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and effects on qRT-PCR were determined by using a 150-bp and a 80-bp amplicon for RPS6. Potential causes of and methods to circumvent RNA degradation were studied by using FNAs from a pancreatic cancer xenograft. RESULTS: RNA extracted from pancreatic mass FNAs was extensively degraded. Fragmentation was related to needle bore diameter and could not be overcome by alterations in aspiration technique. Multiplex PCR for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase could distinguish samples that were suitable for qRT-PCR. The use of short PCR amplicons (<100 bp) provided reliable gene expression analysis from FNAs. When appropriate samples were used, the assay was highly reproducible for gene copy number with minimal (0.0003 or about 0.7% of total) variance. CONCLUSIONS: The degraded properties of endoscopic FNAs markedly affect the accuracy of gene expression measurements. Our novel approach to designate specimens "informative" for qRT-PCR allowed accurate molecular assessment for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biomarker use for pancreatic cancer diagnosis has been impaired by a lack of samples suitable for reliable quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Fine needle aspirates (FNAs) from pancreatic masses were studied to define potential causes of RNA degradation and develop methods for accurately measuring gene expression. METHODS: Samples from 32 patients were studied. RNA degradation was assessed by using a multiplex PCR assay for varying lengths of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and effects on qRT-PCR were determined by using a 150-bp and a 80-bp amplicon for RPS6. Potential causes of and methods to circumvent RNA degradation were studied by using FNAs from a pancreatic cancer xenograft. RESULTS: RNA extracted from pancreatic mass FNAs was extensively degraded. Fragmentation was related to needle bore diameter and could not be overcome by alterations in aspiration technique. Multiplex PCR for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase could distinguish samples that were suitable for qRT-PCR. The use of short PCR amplicons (<100 bp) provided reliable gene expression analysis from FNAs. When appropriate samples were used, the assay was highly reproducible for gene copy number with minimal (0.0003 or about 0.7% of total) variance. CONCLUSIONS: The degraded properties of endoscopic FNAs markedly affect the accuracy of gene expression measurements. Our novel approach to designate specimens "informative" for qRT-PCR allowed accurate molecular assessment for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
Authors: Mehdi Benchekroun; Juli DeGraw; Jane Gao; Li Sun; Kristina von Boguslawsky; Arto Leminen; Leif C Andersson; Marja Heiskala Journal: Diagn Mol Pathol Date: 2004-06
Authors: Douglas G Adler; Jason D Conway; Joseph M B Coffie; James A Disario; Daniel S Mishkin; Raj J Shah; Lehel Somogyi; William M Tierney; Louis Michel Wong Kee Song; Bret T Petersen Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Ru Chen; Sheng Pan; Kelly Cooke; Kara White Moyes; Mary P Bronner; David R Goodlett; Ruedi Aebersold; Teresa A Brentnall Journal: Pancreas Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Shannon K Penland; Temitope O Keku; Chad Torrice; Xiaping He; Janakiraman Krishnamurthy; Katherine A Hoadley; John T Woosley; Nancy E Thomas; Charles M Perou; Robert S Sandler; Norman E Sharpless Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2007-02-12 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Michael B Wallace; James Ravenel; Mark I Block; Mostafa Fraig; Gerard Silvestri; Stephan Wildi; Nathan Schmulewitz; Shyam Varadarajulu; Stacey Roberts; Brenda J Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Carolyn E Reed Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: E H van Beers; S A Joosse; M J Ligtenberg; R Fles; F B L Hogervorst; S Verhoef; P M Nederlof Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-01-30 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Martina Schobesberger; Anna Baltzer; Andrea Oberli; Andreas Kappeler; Mathias Gugger; Hana Burger; Rolf Jaggi Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: H Thiemeyer; L Taher; J T Schille; L Harder; S O Hungerbuehler; R Mischke; M Hewicker-Trautwein; Z Kiełbowicz; B Brenig; E Schütz; J Beck; H Murua Escobar; I Nolte Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 4.379