Nicole Y K Li1, Seth Dailey, Susan L Thibeault. 1. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2275, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/ HYPOTHESIS: The use of molecular testing is becoming more significant for the diagnosis and classification of disease. The application of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy as the means of sampling lesions in union with molecular testing could be a powerful combination in laryngology. The objectives of this study were to investigate 1) if FNA was feasible to sample benign vocal fold lesions; 2) if FNA samples provided sufficient RNA quality for molecular analysis; and 3) if gene expression of FNA samples matched paired surgical excised specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional. METHODS: Fifteen vocal fold specimens were obtained from adult patients undergoing routine surgical removal for benign vocal fold lesions using FNA and surgical excision. Comparisons were made between FNA and excision biopsies for RNA quality. Correlative analysis was completed for RNA expression of nine genes, including decorin (DCN), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), collagen type VI alpha 3 (COL6A3), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), glutathione S-transferase (GST2), collagen type I alpha 2 (COL1A2), ATP binding cassette (ABC), and procollagen I alpha 1 (COL1A1). RESULTS: FNA and excision samples demonstrated similar RNA quality (P > 0.05). Per gene expression, four out of nine genes were moderately correlated between the paired samples (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FNA of the vocal fold lamina propria is technically feasible to perform. Further improvement in the FNA technology is desirable to optimize RNA quality for reliable gene expression analysis.
OBJECTIVES/ HYPOTHESIS: The use of molecular testing is becoming more significant for the diagnosis and classification of disease. The application of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy as the means of sampling lesions in union with molecular testing could be a powerful combination in laryngology. The objectives of this study were to investigate 1) if FNA was feasible to sample benign vocal fold lesions; 2) if FNA samples provided sufficient RNA quality for molecular analysis; and 3) if gene expression of FNA samples matched paired surgical excised specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional. METHODS: Fifteen vocal fold specimens were obtained from adult patients undergoing routine surgical removal for benign vocal fold lesions using FNA and surgical excision. Comparisons were made between FNA and excision biopsies for RNA quality. Correlative analysis was completed for RNA expression of nine genes, including decorin (DCN), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), collagen type VI alpha 3 (COL6A3), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), glutathione S-transferase (GST2), collagen type I alpha 2 (COL1A2), ATP binding cassette (ABC), and procollagen I alpha 1 (COL1A1). RESULTS: FNA and excision samples demonstrated similar RNA quality (P > 0.05). Per gene expression, four out of nine genes were moderately correlated between the paired samples (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FNA of the vocal fold lamina propria is technically feasible to perform. Further improvement in the FNA technology is desirable to optimize RNA quality for reliable gene expression analysis.
Authors: Margaret A Shipp; Ken N Ross; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew P Weng; Jeffery L Kutok; Ricardo C T Aguiar; Michelle Gaasenbeek; Michael Angelo; Michael Reich; Geraldine S Pinkus; Tane S Ray; Margaret A Koval; Kim W Last; Andrew Norton; T Andrew Lister; Jill Mesirov; Donna S Neuberg; Eric S Lander; Jon C Aster; Todd R Golub Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Clark A Rosen; Jackie Gartner-Schmidt; Bridget Hathaway; C Blake Simpson; Gregory N Postma; Mark Courey; Robert T Sataloff Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Gilberto V Teixeira; Horacio Chikota; Thiago Teixeira; Gabriel Manfro; Sara I Pai; Ralph P Tufano Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: M Bittner; P Meltzer; Y Chen; Y Jiang; E Seftor; M Hendrix; M Radmacher; R Simon; Z Yakhini; A Ben-Dor; N Sampas; E Dougherty; E Wang; F Marincola; C Gooden; J Lueders; A Glatfelter; P Pollock; J Carpten; E Gillanders; D Leja; K Dietrich; C Beaudry; M Berens; D Alberts; V Sondak Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; R E Davis; C Ma; I S Lossos; A Rosenwald; J C Boldrick; H Sabet; T Tran; X Yu; J I Powell; L Yang; G E Marti; T Moore; J Hudson; L Lu; D B Lewis; R Tibshirani; G Sherlock; W C Chan; T C Greiner; D D Weisenburger; J O Armitage; R Warnke; R Levy; W Wilson; M R Grever; J C Byrd; D Botstein; P O Brown; L M Staudt Journal: Nature Date: 2000-02-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jennifer L Marti; Diego Ayo; Pascale Levine; Osvaldo Hernandez; John Rescigno; Deborah M Axelrod Journal: Breast J Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 2.431