OBJECTIVES: Pancreatitis is an inflammatory condition of the pancreas. However, it often shares many molecular features with pancreatic cancer. Biomarkers present in pancreatic cancer frequently occur in the setting of pancreatitis. The efforts to develop diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer have thus been complicated by the false-positive involvement of pancreatitis. METHODS: In an attempt to develop protein biomarkers for pancreatic cancer, we previously use quantitative proteomics to identify and quantify the proteins from pancreatic cancer juice. Pancreatic juice is a rich source of proteins that are shed by the pancreatic ductal cells. In this study, we used a similar approach to identify and quantify proteins from pancreatitis juice. RESULTS: In total, 72 proteins were identified and quantified in the comparison of pancreatic juice from pancreatitis patients versus pooled normal control juice. Nineteen of the juice proteins were overexpressed, and 8 were underexpressed in pancreatitis juice by at least 2-fold compared with normal pancreatic juice. Of these 27 differentially expressed proteins in pancreatitis, 9 proteins were also differentially expressed in the pancreatic juice from pancreatic cancer patient. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of these differentially expressed proteins from pancreatitis juice provides useful information for future study of specific pancreatitis-associated proteins and to eliminate potential false-positive biomarkers for pancreatic cancer.
OBJECTIVES:Pancreatitis is an inflammatory condition of the pancreas. However, it often shares many molecular features with pancreatic cancer. Biomarkers present in pancreatic cancer frequently occur in the setting of pancreatitis. The efforts to develop diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer have thus been complicated by the false-positive involvement of pancreatitis. METHODS: In an attempt to develop protein biomarkers for pancreatic cancer, we previously use quantitative proteomics to identify and quantify the proteins from pancreatic cancer juice. Pancreatic juice is a rich source of proteins that are shed by the pancreatic ductal cells. In this study, we used a similar approach to identify and quantify proteins from pancreatitis juice. RESULTS: In total, 72 proteins were identified and quantified in the comparison of pancreatic juice from pancreatitispatients versus pooled normal control juice. Nineteen of the juice proteins were overexpressed, and 8 were underexpressed in pancreatitis juice by at least 2-fold compared with normal pancreatic juice. Of these 27 differentially expressed proteins in pancreatitis, 9 proteins were also differentially expressed in the pancreatic juice from pancreatic cancerpatient. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of these differentially expressed proteins from pancreatitis juice provides useful information for future study of specific pancreatitis-associated proteins and to eliminate potential false-positive biomarkers for pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Ru Chen; Sheng Pan; Eugene C Yi; Samuel Donohoe; Mary P Bronner; John D Potter; David R Goodlett; Ruedi Aebersold; Teresa A Brentnall Journal: Proteomics Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: M L Meli; F Carrel; R Waibel; H Amstutz; N Crompton; R Jaussi; H Moch; P A Schubiger; I Novak-Hofer Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1999-10-29 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: H Friess; D Cantero; H Graber; W H Tang; X Guo; M Kashiwagi; A Zimmermann; L Gold; M Korc; M W Büchler Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: H Friess; R Duarte; J Kleeff; A Fukuda; W H Tang; H Graber; M Schilling; A Zimmermann; M Korc; M W Büchler Journal: Surgery Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Phil A Hart; Mark Topazian; Massimo Raimondo; Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; William E Fisher; Gregory B Lesinski; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Joao A Paulo; Vivek Kadiyala; Linda S Lee; Peter A Banks; Darwin L Conwell; Hanno Steen Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Sheng Pan; Ru Chen; David A Crispin; Damon May; Tyler Stevens; Martin W McIntosh; Mary P Bronner; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver; Teresa A Brentnall Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Mindy Porterfield; Peng Zhao; Haiyong Han; John Cunningham; Kazuhiro Aoki; Daniel D Von Hoff; Michael J Demeure; J Michael Pierce; Michael Tiemeyer; Lance Wells Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Xuequn Chen; Maria Dolors Sans; John R Strahler; Alla Karnovsky; Stephen A Ernst; George Michailidis; Philip C Andrews; John A Williams Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Joao A Paulo; Vivek Kadiyala; Aleksandr Gaun; John F K Sauld; Ali Ghoulidi; Peter A Banks; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell Journal: JOP Date: 2013-03-10
Authors: H C Harsha; Kumaran Kandasamy; Prathibha Ranganathan; Sandhya Rani; Subhashri Ramabadran; Sashikanth Gollapudi; Lavanya Balakrishnan; Sutopa B Dwivedi; Deepthi Telikicherla; Lakshmi Dhevi N Selvan; Renu Goel; Suresh Mathivanan; Arivusudar Marimuthu; Manoj Kashyap; Robert F Vizza; Robert J Mayer; James A Decaprio; Sudhir Srivastava; Samir M Hanash; Ralph H Hruban; Akhilesh Pandey Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 11.069