Literature DB >> 20706955

Memory and the Moses illusion: failures to detect contradictions with stored knowledge yield negative memorial consequences.

Hayden C Bottoms1, Andrea N Eslick, Elizabeth J Marsh.   

Abstract

Although contradictions with stored knowledge are common in daily life, people often fail to notice them. For example, in the Moses illusion, participants fail to notice errors in questions such as "How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?" despite later showing knowledge that the Biblical reference is to Noah, not Moses. We examined whether error prevalence affected participants' ability to detect distortions in questions, and whether this in turn had memorial consequences. Many of the errors were overlooked, but participants were better able to catch them when they were more common. More generally, the failure to detect errors had negative memorial consequences, increasing the likelihood that the errors were used to answer later general knowledge questions. Methodological implications of this finding are discussed, as it suggests that typical analyses likely underestimate the size of the Moses illusion. Overall, answering distorted questions can yield errors in the knowledge base; most importantly, prior knowledge does not protect against these negative memorial consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20706955     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2010.501558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  8 in total

1.  Memory for flip-flopping: detection and recollection of political contradictions.

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Christopher N Wahlheim; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

2.  Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency.

Authors:  Nadia M Brashier; Sharda Umanath; Roberto Cabeza; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-03-23

3.  Ironic effects of drawing attention to story errors.

Authors:  Andrea N Eslick; Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-02-02

4.  Neural basis of goal-driven changes in knowledge activation.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Wang; Nadia M Brashier; Erik A Wing; Elizabeth J Marsh; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: plausibility effects on memory for misinformation.

Authors:  Scott R Hinze; Daniel G Slaten; William S Horton; Ryan Jenkins; David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

6.  The Spanish General Knowledge Norms.

Authors:  Jon A Duñabeitia; Kim L Griffin; Juan L Martín; Mireia Oliva; María L Sámano; Lela Ivaz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Recent study, but not retrieval, of knowledge protects against learning errors.

Authors:  Hillary G Mullet; Sharda Umanath; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

8.  Does Anyone Know the Answer to that Question? Individual Differences in Judging Answerability.

Authors:  Bodil S A Karlsson; Carl Martin Allwood; Sandra Buratti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.