Literature DB >> 20705562

Breast cancer classification according to immunohistochemistry markers: subtypes and association with clinicopathologic variables in a peruvian hospital database.

Carlos S Vallejos1, Henry L Gómez, Wilder R Cruz, Joseph A Pinto, Richard R Dyer, Raúl Velarde, Juan F Suazo, Silvia P Neciosup, Mauricio León, Miguel A de la Cruz, Carlos E Vigil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Molecular classification is an excellent prognostic and predictive method in breast cancer (BC). In this study. we evaluated differences in clinicopathologic features and overall survival (OS) in four BC molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, basal cell-like, and HER2/neu. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 was performed using a Peruvian hospital database of 1198 BC patients who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2002. Overall survival was calculated.
RESULTS: Out of 1198 patients with invasive BC, 49.3% were luminal A; 13.2%, luminal B; 21.3%, basal-like; and 16.2%, HER2. The mean of age at diagnosis was 51.5 years for luminal A; 49.6 for luminal B; 49.5 for basal-like; and 49.4 for HER2. The HER2 subtype showed 63.7% positive lymph nodes, 42.3% stage III and 9.7% stage IV cases. Basal subtypes showed the highest prevalence of a poorly differentiated phenotype (70.3%). Average follow-up was 60 months. Five-year OS was significantly different between all 4 groups (P < .0001); luminal A had the highest OS, followed by luminal B, basal-like; and HER2. Results are compared with other population studies.
CONCLUSION: This study shows significant differences between the distribution of molecular subtypes and clinicopathologic features. Immunohistochemistry is useful in the clinical management of BC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20705562     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2010.n.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  45 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis from breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlos A Castaneda; Raymundo Flores; Katerin Y Rojas; Miluska Castillo; Ketty Dolores-Cerna; Claudio Flores; Carolina Belmar-Lopez; Esperanza Milla; Henry Gomez
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015-04-23

Review 2.  Breast cancer intrinsic subtype classification, clinical use and future trends.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Dai; Ting Li; Zhonghu Bai; Yankun Yang; Xiuxia Liu; Jinling Zhan; Bozhi Shi
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Molecular phenotype is associated with survival in breast cancer patients with spinal bone metastases.

Authors:  L Bollen; C Wibmer; M Wang; Y M van der Linden; A Leithner; C E Bünger; A B Jensen; M Fiocco; G Bratschitsch; W Pondaag; J V M G Bovée; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Breast cancer stage prediction: a computational approach guided by transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  K Athira; G Gopakumar
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer Is Associated with Indigenous American Ancestry in Latin American Women.

Authors:  Katie M Marker; Valentina A Zavala; Tatiana Vidaurre; Paul C Lott; Jeannie Navarro Vásquez; Sandro Casavilca-Zambrano; Mónica Calderón; Julio E Abugattas; Henry L Gómez; Hugo A Fuentes; Ruddy Liendo Picoaga; Jose M Cotrina; Silvia P Neciosup; Carlos A Castañeda; Zaida Morante; Fernando Valencia; Javier Torres; Magdalena Echeverry; Mabel E Bohórquez; Guadalupe Polanco-Echeverry; Ana P Estrada-Florez; Silvia J Serrano-Gómez; Jenny A Carmona-Valencia; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; María Carolina Sanabria-Salas; Alejandro Velez; Jorge Donado; Sikai Song; Daniel Cherry; Lizeth I Tamayo; Scott Huntsman; Donglei Hu; Roberto Ruiz-Cordero; Ronald Balassanian; Elad Ziv; Jovanny Zabaleta; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Laura Fejerman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Luminal breast cancer classification according to proliferative indices: clinicopathological characteristics and short-term survival analysis.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Gang Nie; Zhimin Wei; Zhidong Lv; Xiaoyi Liu; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Breast Cancer in Latinas: A Focus on Intrinsic Subtypes Distribution.

Authors:  Silvia J Serrano-Gómez; Laura Fejerman; Jovanny Zabaleta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Differential response of immunohistochemically defined breast cancer subtypes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel.

Authors:  George Fountzilas; Urania Dafni; Mattheos Bobos; Anna Batistatou; Vassiliki Kotoula; Helen Trihia; Vassiliki Malamou-Mitsi; Spyros Miliaras; Sofia Chrisafi; Savvas Papadopoulos; Maria Sotiropoulou; Theodoros Filippidis; Helen Gogas; Triantafyllia Koletsa; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Despina Televantou; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Dimitrios Pectasides; Dimosthenis V Skarlos; Angelos Koutras; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Recent omics technologies and their emerging applications for personalised medicine.

Authors:  Dong-Hyuk Kim; Young-Sook Kim; Nam-Il Son; Chan-Koo Kang; Ah-Ram Kim
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.615

10.  Biology of primary breast cancer in older women treated by surgery: with correlation with long-term clinical outcome and comparison with their younger counterparts.

Authors:  B M Syed; A R Green; E C Paish; D Soria; J Garibaldi; L Morgan; D A L Morgan; I O Ellis; K L Cheung
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.