Literature DB >> 3993852

Complications of colostomy closure.

S E Parks, P R Hastings.   

Abstract

The records of 83 patients with 85 colostomy closures at Charity Hospital, New Orleans from January 1976 through June 1981 were reviewed. There were 47 complications in 30 patients (36 percent) with no deaths. The material used for anastomosis and fascial closure, the precipitating or underlying disease, the site of colostomy, and the length of operation did not influence the complication rate. The major factor affecting the complication rate was the interval of time from creation of the colostomy to its closure. Those patients who underwent closure after a 90 day interval had a lower overall complication rate than comparison groups with less than a 30 day interval and 30 to 90 day intervals (p less than 0.05). Other factors that appeared to influence the complication rate were as follows: loop colostomies had a lower suture line complication rate than divided colostomies, patients who underwent relaparotomy and closure had a higher complication rate than those whose closures were confined to the colostomy site, and wounds left open or that underwent delayed primary closure had a lower infection rate than wounds closed primarily. Thus, loop colostomies appear to have fewer complications at the time of closure than divided stomas. This is most likely related to the necessity for relaparotomy in some of the patients with divided stomas and the need for minimal mesenteric dissection required for most loop colostomy patients. Divided stomas should still be created if indicated, but when a choice exists, loop colostomies are preferable. Contaminated wounds are best managed with secondary closure or delayed primary closure. Because of the significant difference in complication rates between intervals from formation to closure of a colostomy, all patients should have their colostomies closed only after a minimum of 90 days has elapsed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3993852     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80153-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  16 in total

1.  Healing of a left colon anastomosis after early colostomy closure. An experimental study in the rat.

Authors:  P Udén; P Blomquist; H Jiborn; B Zederfeldt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Predictors for complications after loop stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Herwig Pokorny; Harald Herkner; Raimund Jakesz; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal.

Authors:  Yuma Wada; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayuki Ohue; Shingo Noura; Shiki Fujino; Keijirou Sugimura; Hirofumi Akita; Masaaki Motoori; Kunihito Gotoh; Hidenori Takahashi; Shogo Kobayashi; Takeshi Ohmori; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-06

4.  Protective colostomy closure: the hazards of a "minor" operation.

Authors:  D F Altomare; O C Pannarale; L Lupo; N Palasciano; V Memeo; M Rubino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Decrease in collagenous proteins and mechanical strength of distal colon after diverting colostomy in rats.

Authors:  P Kissmeyer-Nielsen; H Christensen; S Laurberg
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A totally diverting loop colostomy.

Authors:  N D Merrett; P C Gartell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Ostomy Closures in Children: Variations in Perioperative Care Do Not Change the Outcome.

Authors:  Yusuf Hakan Çavuşoğlu; Ayşe Karaman; Çağatay Evrim Afşarlar; İbrahim Karaman; Derya Erdoğan; İsmet Faruk Özgüner
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Endoscopy-based early enterostomy closure for superior mesenteric arterial occlusion.

Authors:  Takatsugu Oida; Hisao Kano; Kenji Mimatsu; Atsushi Kawasaki; Youichi Kuboi; Nobutada Fukino; Sadao Amano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture.

Authors:  Thao T Marquez; Dimitrios Christoforidis; Anasooya Abraham; Robert D Madoff; David A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation.

Authors:  A Cingi; A Solmaz; W Attaallah; A Aslan; A O Aktan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.