| Literature DB >> 20703394 |
Sreemoyee Tarafder1, Pallabi Bhattacharya, Debika Paul, Gautam Bandyopadhyay, Pritha Mukhopadhyay.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent brain imaging and electrophysiological studies have consistently shown dysfunction of the fronto-striatal thalamic pathways in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). AIM: To study the relationship of neuropsychological disposition with the executive functions and cognitive style in patients with OCD.Entities:
Keywords: Neuropsychology; cognitive style; executive function; obsessive–compulsive disorder; subcortical–cerebeller–spinal domain
Year: 2006 PMID: 20703394 PMCID: PMC2913556 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.31598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Psychiatry ISSN: 0019-5545 Impact factor: 1.759
Comparative status of the patients with OCD and normal controls on Adult Neuropsychological Questionnaire
| General health | Substance abuse | Psychiatric problem | General neurological | Right hemisphere | left hemisphere | Subcortical-cerebellar-spinal | Sensory perceptual | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCD (Mean) | 7.35 | 0.6 | 4.9 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 2.25 | 4.55 | 2.5 |
| OCD (SD) | 3.04 | 0.66 | 1.6 | 1.38 | 0.97 | 1.13 | 2.36 | 1.75 |
| NORMAL (Mean) | 4.15 | 0.95 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.95 | 1.0 | 1.45 |
| NORMAL (SD) | 1.79 | 0.94 | 1.54 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.99 | 1.03 | 1.15 |
| U TEST | 71 | 158 | 63 | 61 | 83 | 79 | 44 | 135 |
| ASYM significance | 0.000 | 0.212 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.072 |
p>0.05;
p>0.01;
p>0.001
Fig. 1Comparative status of the patients with OCD and normal controls on Adult Neuropsychological Questionnaire
Comparative status of the patients with OCD and normal controls on Embedded Figure Test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
| EFT | Perseverative response | Perseverative error | Non-perseverative error | Conceptual level response | Number of category completion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCD (Mean) | 92.2 | 24.5 | 25.75 | 49.65 | 19.3 | 3 |
| OCD (SD) | 45.08 | 32.42 | 35.36 | 38.27 | 29.2 | 2.3 |
| NORMAL (Mean) | 53.96 | 113.55 | 112.1 | 102.4 | 92.4 | 5.45 |
| NORMAL (SD) | 17.85 | 25.36 | 30.96 | 9.95 | 20.19 | 0.74 |
| U TEST | 79 | 12.5 | 18 | 42.5 | 22.5 | 89.5 |
| ASYM significance | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
p>0.05;
p>0.01;
p>0.001
Fig. 2Comparative status of the patients with OCD and normal controls on Embedded Figure Test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Correlation between variables of ANQ and WCST and EFT
| Correlated variables | Spearman value | Level of significance | |
| GH | PP | 0.589 | 0.000 |
| GN | 0.593 | 0.000 | |
| LH | 0.597 | 0.000 | |
| SCS | 0.735 | 0.000 | |
| S/P | 0.666 | 0.000 | |
| EFT | 0.372 | 0.018 | |
| PP | GN | 0.746 | 0.000 |
| RH | 0.408 | 0.089 | |
| LH | 0.506 | 0.001 | |
| SCS | 0.544 | 0.000 | |
| S/P | 0.300 | 0.009 | |
| PR | −0.392 | 0.012 | |
| PE | −0.491 | 0.001 | |
| GN | RH | 0.317 | 0.046* |
| LH | 0.458 | 0.003 | |
| SCS | 0.669 | 0.000 | |
| S/P | 0.415 | 0.008 | |
| RH | NPE | −0.361 | 0. 022 |
| LH | SCS | 0.615 | 0.000 |
| S/P | 0.440 | 0.005 | |
| PR | −0.385 | 0.014 | |
| PE | −0.372 | 0.018 | |
| SCS | S/P | 0.485 | 0.002 |
| EFT | 0.378 | 0.016 | |
| CLR | −0.379 | 0.016 | |
| EFT | NOCC | −0.551 | 0.000 |
p>0.05;
p>0.01;
p>0.001