Literature DB >> 20702872

Adaptation to different mouth shapes influences visual perception of ambiguous lip speech.

Benedict C Jones1, David R Feinberg, Patricia E G Bestelmeyer, Lisa M Debruine, Anthony C Little.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of adaptation to mouth shapes associated with different spoken sounds (sustained /m/ or /u/) on visual perception of lip speech. Participants were significantly more likely to label ambiguous faces on an /m/-to-/u/ continuum as saying /u/ following adaptation to /m/ mouth shapes than they were in a preadaptation test. By contrast, participants were significantly less likely to label the ambiguous faces as saying /u/ following adaptation to /u/ mouth shapes than they were in a preadaptation test. The magnitude of these aftereffects was equivalent when the same individual was shown in the adaptation and test phases of the experiment and when different individuals were presented in the adaptation and test phases. These findings present novel evidence that adaptation to natural variations in facial appearance influences face perception, and they extend previous research on face aftereffects to visual perception of lip speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20702872     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  26 in total

1.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.264

3.  Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Layla Unger; Anthony C Little; David R Feinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information.

Authors:  Sabine van Linden; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding.

Authors:  P E G Bestelmeyer; B C Jones; L M Debruine; A C Little; D I Perrett; A Schneider; L L M Welling; C A Conway
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-09-17

8.  Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system.

Authors:  Andrew J Calder; Rob Jenkins; Anneli Cassel; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-05

9.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08

10.  Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Peter Dayan; Richard M Lipkin; Ning Qian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Jerrold Lieblich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Influences of selective adaptation on perception of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  James W Dias; Theresa C Cook; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-05

4.  Selectivity of face distortion aftereffects for differences in expression or gender.

Authors:  Megan A Tillman; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-30

5.  Adaptation to antifaces and the perception of correct famous identity in an average face.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Peter J B Hancock; Lisa M Debruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-17

6.  Repetitive Exposure to Orofacial Somatosensory Inputs in Speech Perceptual Training Modulates Vowel Categorization in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; Rintaro Ogane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

7.  Face distortion aftereffects evoked by featureless first-order stimulus configurations.

Authors:  Pál Vakli; Kornél Németh; Márta Zimmer; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.