Literature DB >> 27041781

Influences of selective adaptation on perception of audiovisual speech.

James W Dias1, Theresa C Cook1, Lawrence D Rosenblum1.   

Abstract

Research suggests that selective adaptation in speech is a low-level process dependent on sensory-specific information shared between the adaptor and test-stimuli. However, previous research has only examined how adaptors shift perception of unimodal test stimuli, either auditory or visual. In the current series of experiments, we investigated whether adaptation to cross-sensory phonetic information can influence perception of integrated audio-visual phonetic information. We examined how selective adaptation to audio and visual adaptors shift perception of speech along an audiovisual test continuum. This test-continuum consisted of nine audio-/ba/-visual-/va/ stimuli, ranging in visual clarity of the mouth. When the mouth was clearly visible, perceivers "heard" the audio-visual stimulus as an integrated "va" percept 93.7% of the time (e.g., McGurk & MacDonald, 1976). As visibility of the mouth became less clear across the nine-item continuum, the audio-visual "va" percept weakened, resulting in a continuum ranging in audio-visual percepts from /va/ to /ba/. Perception of the test-stimuli was tested before and after adaptation. Changes in audiovisual speech perception were observed following adaptation to visual-/va/ and audiovisual-/va/, but not following adaptation to auditory-/va/, auditory-/ba/, or visual-/ba/. Adaptation modulates perception of integrated audio-visual speech by modulating the processing of sensory-specific information. The results suggest that auditory and visual speech information are not completely integrated at the level of selective adaptation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  McGurk effect; cross-sensory; crossmodal; integration; selective adaptation; sensory; speech perception

Year:  2016        PMID: 27041781      PMCID: PMC4815035          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  37 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory.

Authors:  C Colin; M Radeau; A Soquet; D Demolin; F Colin; P Deltenre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Discrimination tests of visually influenced syllables.

Authors:  L D Rosenblum; H M Saldaña
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

4.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler; D J Dekle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Do you see what you are hearing? Cross-modal effects of speech sounds on lipreading.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Multimodal perceptual organization of speech: Evidence from tone analogs of spoken utterances.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Jennifer M Fellowes; David B Pisoni; Winston D Goh; Philip E Rubin
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 2.017

9.  Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Jerrold Lieblich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Tolerance for audiovisual asynchrony is enhanced by the spectrotemporal fidelity of the speaker's mouth movements and speech.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Stanley Shen; Jess R Kerlin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Repetitive Exposure to Orofacial Somatosensory Inputs in Speech Perceptual Training Modulates Vowel Categorization in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; Rintaro Ogane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Acoustic-phonetic and auditory mechanisms of adaptation in the perception of sibilant fricatives.

Authors:  Eleanor Chodroff; Colin Wilson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.