Literature DB >> 10845349

Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health.

Y Benyamini1, E A Leventhal, H Leventhal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study proposes that women's greater inclusiveness of various sources of information when making self-assessed health (SAH) judgments accounts for the finding that SAH is a weaker predictor of mortality in women than in men.
METHODS: Data from a sample of 830 elderly residents of a retirement community and a 5-year mortality follow-up study were used to examine the bases for women's and men's reports of negative affect (NA) and judgments of SAH. The degree to which each health-related measure accounts for the SAH-mortality association in each gender group was examined.
RESULTS: The findings support two possible explanations for the lower accuracy of SAH as a predictor of mortality among women: 1) In both men and women, NA is associated with poorer SAH, but in men, NA is more closely linked to serious disease in conjunction with other negative life events, whereas in women, NA reflects a wider range of factors not specific to serious disease. 2) Men's SAH judgments reflect mainly serious, life-threatening disease (eg, heart disease), whereas women's SAH judgments reflect both life-threatening and non-life-threatening disease (eg, joint diseases).
CONCLUSIONS: Women's SAH judgments and NAs are based on a wider range of health-related and non-health-related factors than are men's. This difference can explain gender differences in the accuracy of SAH judgments and may be related to other documented differences in women's physical and mental health and illness behavior. The findings emphasize the need to study the bases of NA and other self-evaluations separately for women and men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10845349     DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200005000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  66 in total

1.  The association between sleep duration and self-rated health in the Korean general population.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Kim; Kyung Ran Kim; Kyoung Hee Cho; Ki-Bong Yoo; Jeoung A Kwon; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Research in and Prospects for the Measurement of Health Using Self-Rated Health.

Authors:  Dana Garbarski
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2016-09-16

3.  Using anchoring vignettes to assess group differences in general self-rated health.

Authors:  Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk; Jeremy Freese; Robert M Hauser
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2011-06

4.  Reporting Heterogeneity and Health Disparities Across Gender and Education Levels: Evidence From Four Countries.

Authors:  Teresa Molina
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-04

5.  The effects of response option order and question order on self-rated health.

Authors:  Dana Garbarski; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Are Interactional Behaviors Exhibited When the Self-Reported Health Question is Asked Associated with Health Status?

Authors:  Dana Garbarski; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2011-07-01

7.  Gender-based profiling of Quality of Life (QOL) of primary health care (PHC) attendees in central Uganda: a cross sectional analysis.

Authors:  W W Muhwezi; E S Okello; A K Turiho
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.927

8.  [Compression or expansion of morbidity? Development of health among the older population].

Authors:  F Trachte; S Sperlich; S Geyer
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.281

9.  Does academic achievement during childhood and adolescence benefit later health?

Authors:  Félice Lê-Scherban; Ana V Diez Roux; Yun Li; Hal Morgenstern
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Impact of social position on the effect of cardiovascular risk factors on self-rated health.

Authors:  Cyrille Delpierre; Valérie Lauwers-Cances; Geetanjali D Datta; Lisa Berkman; Thierry Lang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.