Literature DB >> 20700637

Synaptic and intrinsic determinants of the phase resetting curve for weak coupling.

Srisairam Achuthan1, Robert J Butera, Carmen C Canavier.   

Abstract

A phase resetting curve (PRC) keeps track of the extent to which a perturbation at a given phase advances or delays the next spike, and can be used to predict phase locking in networks of oscillators. The PRC can be estimated by convolving the waveform of the perturbation with the infinitesimal PRC (iPRC) under the assumption of weak coupling. The iPRC is often defined with respect to an infinitesimal current as z(i)(ϕ), where ϕ is phase, but can also be defined with respect to an infinitesimal conductance change as z(g)(ϕ). In this paper, we first show that the two approaches are equivalent. Coupling waveforms corresponding to synapses with different time courses sample z(g)(ϕ) in predictably different ways. We show that for oscillators with Type I excitability, an anomalous region in z(g)(ϕ) with opposite sign to that seen otherwise is often observed during an action potential. If the duration of the synaptic perturbation is such that it effectively samples this region, PRCs with both advances and delays can be observed despite Type I excitability. We also show that changing the duration of a perturbation so that it preferentially samples regions of stable or unstable slopes in z(g)(ϕ) can stabilize or destabilize synchrony in a network with the corresponding dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700637      PMCID: PMC3059351          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-010-0264-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  37 in total

1.  The influence of limit cycle topology on the phase resetting curve.

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan; Carmen C Canavier
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  On the phase reduction and response dynamics of neural oscillator populations.

Authors:  Eric Brown; Jeff Moehlis; Philip Holmes
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Synchronization of electrically coupled pairs of inhibitory interneurons in neocortex.

Authors:  Jaime G Mancilla; Timothy J Lewis; David J Pinto; John Rinzel; Barry W Connors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Predictions of phase-locking in excitatory hybrid networks: excitation does not promote phase-locking in pattern-generating networks as reliably as inhibition.

Authors:  Fred H Sieling; Carmen C Canavier; Astrid A Prinz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The dynamic clamp: artificial conductances in biological neurons.

Authors:  A A Sharp; M B O'Neil; L F Abbott; E Marder
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model.

Authors:  X J Wang; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Phase response characteristics of model neurons determine which patterns are expressed in a ring circuit model of gait generation.

Authors:  C C Canavier; R J Butera; R O Dror; D A Baxter; J W Clark; J H Byrne
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Synchrony in excitatory neural networks.

Authors:  D Hansel; G Mato; C Meunier
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.026

10.  Dynamic clamp: computer-generated conductances in real neurons.

Authors:  A A Sharp; M B O'Neil; L F Abbott; E Marder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  11 in total

1.  Biophysical basis of the phase response curve of subthalamic neurons with generalization to other cell types.

Authors:  Michael A Farries; Charles J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Variability, compensation, and modulation in neurons and circuits.

Authors:  Eve Marder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How to correctly quantify neuronal phase-response curves from noisy recordings.

Authors:  Janina Hesse; Susanne Schreiber
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons exhibit type 1 phase-response curves and type 1 excitability.

Authors:  Shuoguo Wang; Maximilian M Musharoff; Carmen C Canavier; Sonia Gasparini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The phase response of the cortical slow oscillation.

Authors:  Arne Weigenand; Thomas Martinetz; Jens Christian Claussen
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 6.  Neurons as oscillators.

Authors:  Klaus M Stiefel; G Bard Ermentrout
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Globally attracting synchrony in a network of oscillators with all-to-all inhibitory pulse coupling.

Authors:  Carmen C Canavier; Ruben A Tikidji-Hamburyan
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.529

8.  Predicting responses to inhibitory synaptic input in substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons.

Authors:  D V Simmons; M H Higgs; S Lebby; C J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Short conduction delays cause inhibition rather than excitation to favor synchrony in hybrid neuronal networks of the entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Shuoguo Wang; Lakshmi Chandrasekaran; Fernando R Fernandez; John A White; Carmen C Canavier
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  On the firing rate dependency of the phase response curve of rat Purkinje neurons in vitro.

Authors:  João Couto; Daniele Linaro; E De Schutter; Michele Giugliano
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.