Literature DB >> 20700114

Sex differences in performance of fecal occult blood testing.

Hermann Brenner1, Ulrike Haug, Sabrina Hundt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Immunological and guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (iFOBTs and gFOBTs) are widely used for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to assess potential sex differences in performance of iFOBTs and gFOBT in the screening setting.
METHODS: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms (CRC or advanced adenoma) were assessed by sex for a range of cutpoints of a quantitative iFOBT (RIDASCREEN Hemoglobin), six qualitative iFOBTs, and a gFOBT (HemOccult) among 1,157 male and 1,167 female participants of the German screening colonoscopy program (mean age: 63.0 and 62.0 years, respectively).
RESULTS: The prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms was much higher among men (13.5%) than among women (7.5%). At any cutpoint of the quantitative iFOBT, and for all qualitative iFOBTs and the gFOBT, the sensitivity and positive predictive value were substantially higher, and specificity and negative predictive value were substantially lower among men than among women. At the cutpoint of 2 μg/g stool given by the manufacturer of the quantitative iFOBT, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values were 47.6, 85.0, 33.0, and 91.3% among men, and 30.7, 89.5, 19.3, and 94.1% among women (P value for sex differences 0.001, 0.002, 0.004, and 0.019, respectively). Sex differences in predictive values were mostly explained by sex differences in the prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms.
CONCLUSIONS: There are major sex differences in the performance of fecal occult blood testing, which might require careful attention in the interpretation of test results, and in the design, modeling, and evaluation of CRC screening strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700114     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  32 in total

1.  Sex and gender considerations in Canadian clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Barbara Clow; Margaret Haworth-Brockman; Patrice Voss
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 2.  The value of models in informing resource allocation in colorectal cancer screening: the case of The Netherlands.

Authors:  Frank van Hees; Ann G Zauber; Harriët van Veldhuizen; Marie-Louise A Heijnen; Corine Penning; Harry J de Koning; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: The gender dilemma.

Authors:  Esmée J Grobbee; Els Wieten; Bettina E Hansen; Esther M Stoop; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon Cw Spaander
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Lisanne M Vendrig; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Sex- and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Sung-Eun Kim; Hee Young Paik; Hyuk Yoon; Jung Eun Lee; Nayoung Kim; Mi-Kyung Sung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Baseline mortality-adjusted survival in resected rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ignazio Tarantino; Sascha A Müller; Rene Warschkow; Yakup Kulu; Bruno M Schmied; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Joanne E Schottinger; Wei K Zhao; Jessica Chubak; Ethan Halm; Nirupa R Ghai; Richard Contreras; Celette Skinner; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Emma H Levine; Cecilia Doan; Anton Gies; Hermann Brenner; Charles Quesenberry; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  E J A Morris; L E Whitehouse; T Farrell; C Nickerson; J D Thomas; P Quirke; M D Rutter; C Rees; P J Finan; J R Wilkinson; J Patnick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.