Literature DB >> 25091850

Baseline mortality-adjusted survival in resected rectal cancer patients.

Ignazio Tarantino1, Sascha A Müller, Rene Warschkow, Yakup Kulu, Bruno M Schmied, Markus W Büchler, Alexis Ulrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This investigation assessed the baseline mortality-adjusted 5-year survival after open rectal cancer resection.
METHODS: The 5-year survival rate was analyzed in 885 consecutive American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-IV rectal cancer patients undergoing open resection between 2002 and 2011 using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for population-based baseline mortality.
RESULTS: The 5-year relative and overall survival rates were 80.9%(95% confidence interval (CI): 77.0-85.0%) and 71.9%(95% CI, 68.4-75.5%), respectively. The 5-year relative survival rates for stage I, II, III, and IV cancer were 97.8% (95% CI, 93.1-102.8%), 90.9%(95% CI, 84.3-98.1%), 72.0% (95% CI, 64.7-80.1%), and 24.4% (95% CI: 16.0-37.0%), respectively. After the curative resection of stage I-III rectal cancer, fewer than every other observed death was cancer-related. The 5-year relative survival rate for stage I cancer did not differ from the matched average national baseline mortality rate (P = 0.419). Higher age (hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, P < 0.001) was protective for relative survival but unfavorable for overall survival (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05, P < 0.001). Female gender was only unfavorable for relative survival (HR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11-2.29, P = 0.014).
CONCLUSION: The analysis of relative survival in a large cohort of rectal cancer patients revealed that stage I rectal cancer is fully curable. The findings regarding age and gender may explain the conflicting results obtained to date from studies based on overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25091850     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2618-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  30 in total

1.  Estimating net survival: the importance of allowing for informative censoring.

Authors:  Coraline Danieli; Laurent Remontet; Nadine Bossard; Laurent Roche; Aurélien Belot
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Life expectancy biases in clinical decision modeling.

Authors:  K M Kuntz; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  A Cox regression model for the relative mortality and its application to diabetes mellitus survival data.

Authors:  P K Andersen; K Borch-Johnsen; T Deckert; A Green; P Hougaard; N Keiding; S Kreiner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Gender disparities in metastatic colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  Andrew Hendifar; Dongyun Yang; Felicitas Lenz; Georg Lurje; Alexandra Pohl; Cosima Lenz; Yan Ning; Wu Zhang; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Clinicopathological and molecular biological features of colorectal cancer in patients less than 40 years of age.

Authors:  J T Liang; K C Huang; A L Cheng; Y M Jeng; M S Wu; S M Wang
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Characteristics of colorectal cancer in young patients at an urban county hospital.

Authors:  Benjamin Karsten; Justin Kim; Justin King; Ravin R Kumar
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD).

Authors:  Michel P Coleman; Manuela Quaresma; Franco Berrino; Jean-Michel Lutz; Roberta De Angelis; Riccardo Capocaccia; Paolo Baili; Bernard Rachet; Gemma Gatta; Timo Hakulinen; Andrea Micheli; Milena Sant; Hannah K Weir; J Mark Elwood; Hideaki Tsukuma; Sergio Koifman; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Silvia Francisci; Mariano Santaquilani; Arduino Verdecchia; Hans H Storm; John L Young
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Making relative survival analysis relatively easy.

Authors:  Maja Pohar; Janez Stare
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Young age is not a poor prognostic marker in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Y F Chung; K W Eu; D Machin; J M Ho; D C Nyam; A F Leong; Y H Ho; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Baseline mortality-adjusted survival in colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristjan Ukegjini; Marcel Zadnikar; Rene Warschkow; Sascha Müller; Bruno M Schmied; Lukas Marti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Peridural analgesia does not impact survival in patients after colon cancer resection: a retrospective propensity score-adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Elena F Wurster; Frank Pianka; Rene Warschkow; Pia Antony; Thorsten Brenner; Markus A Weigand; Bruno M Schmied; Markus W Büchler; Ignazio Tarantino; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Variations of the renal function parameters in rectal cancer patients with a defunctioning loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Dragos Viorel Scripcariu; Dimitrie Siriopol; Mihaela Moscalu; Viorel Scripcariu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  [Epidural block associated with improved long-term survival after surgery for colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching].

Authors:  D L Mu; C Xue; B An; D X Wang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-12-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.