Cara Tannenbaum1, Barbara Clow1, Margaret Haworth-Brockman1, Patrice Voss1. 1. Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy (Tannenbaum), Université de Montréal; Centre de Recherche (Tannenbaum), Institut universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal; Institute of Gender and Health (Tannenbaum, Voss), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Montréal, Que.; Barbara Clow Consulting (Clow); Department of History (Clow), Faculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Sociology (Haworth-Brockman), Faculty of Arts, University of Winnipeg; Rady Faculty of Health Sciences (Haworth-Brockman), National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of sex and gender in the diagnosis and management of health conditions is well established, but the extent to which this evidence is integrated into clinical practice guidelines remains unknown. We aimed to determine the proportion of Canadian clinical practice guidelines that integrate evidence on sex and gender considerations. METHODS: We searched the Canadian Medical Association's CPG Infobase, PubMed, all provincial/territorial websites and websites of professional organizations for English- and French-language Canadian clinical practice guidelines published between January 2013 and June 2015 on selected conditions identified as priorities by policy-makers and practitioners. Citations and text were searched electronically using keyword terms related to sex and gender. Three investigators independently analyzed and categorized the content of text-positive clinical practice guidelines based on clinical relevance for practitioners. RESULTS: Of the 118 clinical practice guidelines that met the inclusion criteria, 79 (66.9%) were text-positive for sex and/or gender keywords; 8 (10%) of the 79 used the keywords only in relation to pregnancy. Of the remaining 71 guidelines, 25 (35%) contained sex-related diagnostic or management recommendations. An additional 5 (7%) contained recommendations for sex-specific laboratory reference values, 29 (41%) referred to differences in epidemiologic features or risk factors only, and 12 (17%) contained nonrelevant mentions of search keywords. Twenty-five (35%) of the text-positive guidelines used the terms "sex" and/or "gender" correctly. INTERPRETATION: Recommendations related to sex and gender are inconsistently reported in Canadian clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines such as the Sex and Gender Equity in Research guidelines may help inform the meaningful inclusion of sex and gender evidence in the development of clinical practice guidelines.
BACKGROUND: The importance of sex and gender in the diagnosis and management of health conditions is well established, but the extent to which this evidence is integrated into clinical practice guidelines remains unknown. We aimed to determine the proportion of Canadian clinical practice guidelines that integrate evidence on sex and gender considerations. METHODS: We searched the Canadian Medical Association's CPG Infobase, PubMed, all provincial/territorial websites and websites of professional organizations for English- and French-language Canadian clinical practice guidelines published between January 2013 and June 2015 on selected conditions identified as priorities by policy-makers and practitioners. Citations and text were searched electronically using keyword terms related to sex and gender. Three investigators independently analyzed and categorized the content of text-positive clinical practice guidelines based on clinical relevance for practitioners. RESULTS: Of the 118 clinical practice guidelines that met the inclusion criteria, 79 (66.9%) were text-positive for sex and/or gender keywords; 8 (10%) of the 79 used the keywords only in relation to pregnancy. Of the remaining 71 guidelines, 25 (35%) contained sex-related diagnostic or management recommendations. An additional 5 (7%) contained recommendations for sex-specific laboratory reference values, 29 (41%) referred to differences in epidemiologic features or risk factors only, and 12 (17%) contained nonrelevant mentions of search keywords. Twenty-five (35%) of the text-positive guidelines used the terms "sex" and/or "gender" correctly. INTERPRETATION: Recommendations related to sex and gender are inconsistently reported in Canadian clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines such as the Sex and Gender Equity in Research guidelines may help inform the meaningful inclusion of sex and gender evidence in the development of clinical practice guidelines.
Authors: Philip Schoenfeld; Brooks Cash; Andrew Flood; Richard Dobhan; John Eastone; Walter Coyle; James W Kikendall; Hyungjin Myra Kim; David G Weiss; Theresa Emory; Arthur Schatzkin; David Lieberman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Markku S Nieminen; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Matthias Hochadel; Helmut Drexler; Michel Komajda; Dirk Brutsaert; Kenneth Dickstein; Piotr Ponikowski; Luigi Tavazzi; Ferenc Follath; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Konstantinos P Letsas; Michalis Efremidis; Stavros P Kounas; Loukas K Pappas; Gerasimos Gavrielatos; Ioannis P Alexanian; Nikolaos P Dimopoulos; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Antonios Sideris; Fotis Kardaras Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2008-11-24 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Soraya Seedat; Kate Margaret Scott; Matthias C Angermeyer; Patricia Berglund; Evelyn J Bromet; Traolach S Brugha; Koen Demyttenaere; Giovanni de Girolamo; Josep Maria Haro; Robert Jin; Elie G Karam; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Daphna Levinson; Maria Elena Medina Mora; Yutaka Ono; Johan Ormel; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Jose Posada-Villa; Nancy A Sampson; David Williams; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2009-07
Authors: Debby G Keuken; Joke A Haafkens; Marian J Hellema; Jako S Burgers; Clara J Moerman Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2007-11-12 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Mathew Hall; Vaishali A Krishnanandan; Matthew C Cheung; Natalie G Coburn; Barbara Haas; Kelvin K W Chan; Michael J Raphael Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Colleen M Norris; Cara Tannenbaum; Louise Pilote; Graham Wong; Warren J Cantor; Micheal S McMurtry Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Amy Hoang-Kim; Camilla Parpia; Cassandra Freitas; Peter C Austin; Heather J Ross; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Karen Tu; Susanna Mak; Michael E Farkouh; Louise Y Sun; Michael J Schull; Robin Mason; Douglas S Lee; Paula A Rochon Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Amédé Gogovor; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Ali Ben Charif; Robert K D McLean; David Moher; Andrew Milat; Luke Wolfenden; Karina Prévost; Emmanuelle Aubin; Paula Rochon; Giraud Ekanmian; Jasmine Sawadogo; Nathalie Rheault; France Légaré Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-01-11
Authors: Emma Forcadell Drago; Maria Rosa Dalmau Llorca; Carina Aguilar Martín; Ignacio Ferreira-González; Zojaina Hernández Rojas; Alessandra Queiroga Gonçalves; Carlos López-Pablo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-06-14
Authors: Colleen M Norris; Cindy Y Y Yip; Kara A Nerenberg; Shahin Jaffer; Jasmine Grewal; Anna L E Levinsson; Sharon L Mulvagh Journal: CJC Open Date: 2020-02-22