Literature DB >> 20696839

Cell-type-specific activation and repression of PU.1 by a complex of discrete, functionally specialized cis-regulatory elements.

Mark A Zarnegar1, Jing Chen, Ellen V Rothenberg.   

Abstract

The transcription factor PU.1 is critical for multiple hematopoietic lineages, but different leukocyte types require strictly distinct patterns of PU.1 regulation. PU.1 is required early for T-cell lineage development but then must be repressed by a stage-specific mechanism correlated with commitment. Other lineages require steady, low expression or upregulation. Until now, only the promoter plus a distal upstream regulatory element (URE) could be invoked to explain nearly all Sfpi1 (PU.1) activation and repression, including bifunctional effects of Runx1. However, the URE is dispensable for most Sfpi1 downregulation in early T cells, and we show that it retains enhancer activity in immature T-lineage cells even where endogenous Sfpi1 is repressed. We now present evidence for another complex of conserved noncoding elements that mediate discrete, cell-type-specific regulatory features of Sfpi1, including a myeloid cell-specific activating element and a separate, pro-T-cell-specific silencer element. These elements yield opposite, cell-type-specific responses to Runx1. T-cell-specific repression requires Runx1 acting through multiple nonconsensus sites in the silencer core. These newly characterized sites recruit Runx1 binding in early T cells in vivo and define a functionally specific scaffold for dose-dependent, Runx-mediated repression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20696839      PMCID: PMC2950536          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00354-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  38 in total

1.  DNA methylation and chromatin structure regulate PU.1 expression.

Authors:  L Amaravadi; M J Klemsz
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.311

2.  PU.1 expression is modulated by the balance of functional sense and antisense RNAs regulated by a shared cis-regulatory element.

Authors:  Alexander K Ebralidze; Florence C Guibal; Ulrich Steidl; Pu Zhang; Sanghoon Lee; Boris Bartholdy; Meritxell Alberich Jorda; Victoria Petkova; Frank Rosenbauer; Gang Huang; Tajhal Dayaram; Johanna Klupp; Karen B O'Brien; Britta Will; Maarten Hoogenkamp; Katherine L B Borden; Constanze Bonifer; Daniel G Tenen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Reciprocal activation of GATA-1 and PU.1 marks initial specification of hematopoietic stem cells into myeloerythroid and myelolymphoid lineages.

Authors:  Yojiro Arinobu; Shin-ichi Mizuno; Yong Chong; Hirokazu Shigematsu; Tadafumi Iino; Hiromi Iwasaki; Thomas Graf; Robin Mayfield; Susan Chan; Philippe Kastner; Koichi Akashi
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  Regulation of the PU.1 gene by distal elements.

Authors:  Y Li; Y Okuno; P Zhang; H S Radomska; H Chen; H Iwasaki; K Akashi; M J Klemsz; S R McKercher; R A Maki; D G Tenen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Constitutive expression of PU.1 in fetal hematopoietic progenitors blocks T cell development at the pro-T cell stage.

Authors:  Michele K Anderson; Angela H Weiss; Gabriela Hernandez-Hoyos; Christopher J Dionne; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  PU.1 is a major downstream target of AML1 (RUNX1) in adult mouse hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Gang Huang; Pu Zhang; Hideyo Hirai; Shannon Elf; Xiaomei Yan; Zhao Chen; Steffen Koschmieder; Yutaka Okuno; Tajhal Dayaram; Joseph D Growney; Ramesh A Shivdasani; D Gary Gilliland; Nancy A Speck; Stephen D Nimer; Daniel G Tenen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-11-11       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Graded repression of PU.1/Sfpi1 gene transcription by GATA factors regulates hematopoietic cell fate.

Authors:  Stella T Chou; Eugene Khandros; L Charles Bailey; Kim E Nichols; Christopher R Vakoc; Yu Yao; Zan Huang; John D Crispino; Ross C Hardison; Gerd A Blobel; Mitchell J Weiss
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  A recurrent network involving the transcription factors PU.1 and Gfi1 orchestrates innate and adaptive immune cell fates.

Authors:  Chauncey J Spooner; Jason X Cheng; Elisabet Pujadas; Peter Laslo; Harinder Singh
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  Stat3 promotes the development of erythroleukemia by inducing Pu.1 expression and inhibiting erythroid differentiation.

Authors:  S Hegde; S Ni; S He; D Yoon; G S Feng; S S Watowich; R F Paulson; P A Hankey
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Early chromatin unfolding by RUNX1: a molecular explanation for differential requirements during specification versus maintenance of the hematopoietic gene expression program.

Authors:  Maarten Hoogenkamp; Monika Lichtinger; Hanna Krysinska; Christophe Lancrin; Deborah Clarke; Andrew Williamson; Luca Mazzarella; Richard Ingram; Helle Jorgensen; Amanda Fisher; Daniel G Tenen; Valerie Kouskoff; Georges Lacaud; Constanze Bonifer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Forging T-Lymphocyte Identity: Intersecting Networks of Transcriptional Control.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg; Jonas Ungerbäck; Ameya Champhekar
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.543

Review 2.  Cytokines, Transcription Factors, and the Initiation of T-Cell Development.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Hosokawa; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Developmental gene networks: a triathlon on the course to T cell identity.

Authors:  Mary A Yui; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  Runx1 promotes murine erythroid progenitor proliferation and inhibits differentiation by preventing Pu.1 downregulation.

Authors:  Michael A Willcockson; Samuel J Taylor; Srikanta Ghosh; Sean E Healton; Justin C Wheat; Tommy J Wilson; Ulrich Steidl; Arthur I Skoultchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bcl11b and combinatorial resolution of cell fate in the T-cell gene regulatory network.

Authors:  William J R Longabaugh; Weihua Zeng; Jingli A Zhang; Hiroyuki Hosokawa; Camden S Jansen; Long Li; Maile Romero-Wolf; Pentao Liu; Hao Yuan Kueh; Ali Mortazavi; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  GATA-3 dose-dependent checkpoints in early T cell commitment.

Authors:  Deirdre D Scripture-Adams; Sagar S Damle; Long Li; Koorosh J Elihu; Shuyang Qin; Alexandra M Arias; Robert R Butler; Ameya Champhekar; Jingli A Zhang; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 7.  Transcriptional control of early T and B cell developmental choices.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 28.527

8.  Differential Expression of PU.1 and Key T Lineage Transcription Factors Distinguishes Fetal and Adult T Cell Development.

Authors:  Encarnacion Montecino-Rodriguez; David Casero; Michael Fice; Jonathan Le; Kenneth Dorshkind
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Distinct Genetic Networks Orchestrate the Emergence of Specific Waves of Fetal and Adult B-1 and B-2 Development.

Authors:  Encarnacion Montecino-Rodriguez; Michael Fice; David Casero; Beata Berent-Maoz; Chad L Barber; Kenneth Dorshkind
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 31.745

10.  Positive feedback between PU.1 and the cell cycle controls myeloid differentiation.

Authors:  Hao Yuan Kueh; Ameya Champhekar; Ameya Champhekhar; Stephen L Nutt; Michael B Elowitz; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.