Literature DB >> 23868921

Positive feedback between PU.1 and the cell cycle controls myeloid differentiation.

Hao Yuan Kueh1, Ameya Champhekar, Ameya Champhekhar, Stephen L Nutt, Michael B Elowitz, Ellen V Rothenberg.   

Abstract

Regulatory gene circuits with positive-feedback loops control stem cell differentiation, but several mechanisms can contribute to positive feedback. Here, we dissect feedback mechanisms through which the transcription factor PU.1 controls lymphoid and myeloid differentiation. Quantitative live-cell imaging revealed that developing B cells decrease PU.1 levels by reducing PU.1 transcription, whereas developing macrophages increase PU.1 levels by lengthening their cell cycles, which causes stable PU.1 accumulation. Exogenous PU.1 expression in progenitors increases endogenous PU.1 levels by inducing cell cycle lengthening, implying positive feedback between a regulatory factor and the cell cycle. Mathematical modeling showed that this cell cycle-coupled feedback architecture effectively stabilizes a slow-dividing differentiated state. These results show that cell cycle duration functions as an integral part of a positive autoregulatory circuit to control cell fate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868921      PMCID: PMC3913367          DOI: 10.1126/science.1240831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  42 in total

1.  Reciprocal activation of GATA-1 and PU.1 marks initial specification of hematopoietic stem cells into myeloerythroid and myelolymphoid lineages.

Authors:  Yojiro Arinobu; Shin-ichi Mizuno; Yong Chong; Hirokazu Shigematsu; Tadafumi Iino; Hiromi Iwasaki; Thomas Graf; Robin Mayfield; Susan Chan; Philippe Kastner; Koichi Akashi
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 2.  Cell cycle control of mammalian neural stem cells: putting a speed limit on G1.

Authors:  Paolo Salomoni; Federico Calegari
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  Architecture of a lymphomyeloid developmental switch controlled by PU.1, Notch and Gata3.

Authors:  Marissa Morales Del Real; Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Two distinct auto-regulatory loops operate at the PU.1 locus in B cells and myeloid cells.

Authors:  Mathias Leddin; Chiara Perrod; Maarten Hoogenkamp; Saeed Ghani; Salam Assi; Sven Heinz; Nicola K Wilson; George Follows; Jörg Schönheit; Lena Vockentanz; Ali M Mosammam; Wei Chen; Daniel G Tenen; David R Westhead; Berthold Göttgens; Constanze Bonifer; Frank Rosenbauer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Spi-1/PU.1 proto-oncogene induces opposite effects on monocytic and erythroid differentiation of K562 cells.

Authors:  M D Delgado; P Gutiérrez; C Richard; M A Cuadrado; F Moreau-Gachelin; J León
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  A recurrent network involving the transcription factors PU.1 and Gfi1 orchestrates innate and adaptive immune cell fates.

Authors:  Chauncey J Spooner; Jason X Cheng; Elisabet Pujadas; Peter Laslo; Harinder Singh
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  PU.1 is a suppressor of myeloid leukemia, inactivated in mice by gene deletion and mutation of its DNA binding domain.

Authors:  Wendy D Cook; Benjamin J McCaw; Christopher Herring; Deborah L John; Simon J Foote; Stephen L Nutt; Jerry M Adams
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Dynamic regulation of PU.1 expression in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors.

Authors:  Stephen L Nutt; Donald Metcalf; Angela D'Amico; Matthew Polli; Li Wu
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences.

Authors:  Khuloud Jaqaman; Dinah Loerke; Marcel Mettlen; Hirotaka Kuwata; Sergio Grinstein; Sandra L Schmid; Gaudenz Danuser
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Sustained PU.1 levels balance cell-cycle regulators to prevent exhaustion of adult hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Philipp B Staber; Pu Zhang; Min Ye; Robert S Welner; César Nombela-Arrieta; Christian Bach; Marc Kerenyi; Boris A Bartholdy; Hong Zhang; Meritxell Alberich-Jordà; Sanghoon Lee; Henry Yang; Felicia Ng; Junyan Zhang; Mathias Leddin; Leslie E Silberstein; Gerald Hoefler; Stuart H Orkin; Berthold Göttgens; Frank Rosenbauer; Gang Huang; Daniel G Tenen
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  126 in total

Review 1.  Forging T-Lymphocyte Identity: Intersecting Networks of Transcriptional Control.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg; Jonas Ungerbäck; Ameya Champhekar
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.543

2.  Haematopoiesis: A long cell cycle for myeloid differentiation.

Authors:  Maria Papatriantafyllou
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  A HESitant decision for T cells.

Authors:  Alexandra Bortnick; Cornelis Murre
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  DNA methylation secures CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell lineage borders.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Alexander Y Rudensky
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Slowly dividing neural progenitors are an embryonic origin of adult neural stem cells.

Authors:  Shohei Furutachi; Hiroaki Miya; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Hiroki Kawai; Norihiko Yamasaki; Yujin Harada; Itaru Imayoshi; Mark Nelson; Keiichi I Nakayama; Yusuke Hirabayashi; Yukiko Gotoh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Transcription factor-mediated reprogramming toward hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Wataru Ebina; Derrick J Rossi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Causal Gene Regulatory Network Modeling and Genomics: Second-Generation Challenges.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Multiple DNA-binding modes for the ETS family transcription factor PU.1.

Authors:  Shingo Esaki; Marina G Evich; Noa Erlitzki; Markus W Germann; Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  A stochastic epigenetic switch controls the dynamics of T-cell lineage commitment.

Authors:  Kenneth Kh Ng; Mary A Yui; Arnav Mehta; Sharmayne Siu; Blythe Irwin; Shirley Pease; Satoshi Hirose; Michael B Elowitz; Ellen V Rothenberg; Hao Yuan Kueh
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Distinct Genetic Networks Orchestrate the Emergence of Specific Waves of Fetal and Adult B-1 and B-2 Development.

Authors:  Encarnacion Montecino-Rodriguez; Michael Fice; David Casero; Beata Berent-Maoz; Chad L Barber; Kenneth Dorshkind
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 31.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.