Literature DB >> 20694501

Combining prospective motion correction and distortion correction for EPI: towards a comprehensive correction of motion and susceptibility-induced artifacts.

Rainer Boegle1, Julian Maclaren, Maxim Zaitsev.   

Abstract

OBJECT: State-of-the-art MR techniques that rely on echo planar imaging (EPI), such as real-time fMRI, are limited in their applicability by both subject motion and B(0) field inhomogeneities. The goal of this work is to demonstrate that in principle it is possible to accurately predict the B(0) field inhomogeneities that occur during echo planar imaging in the presence of large scale head motion and apply this knowledge for distortion correction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this work, prospective motion correction is combined with a field-prediction method and a method for correcting geometric distortions in EPI. To validate the methods, echo planar images were acquired of a custom-made phantom rotated to different angles relative to the B(0) field. For each orientation, field maps were acquired for comparison with the field predictions.
RESULTS: The calculated field maps are very similar to the measured field maps for all orientations used in the experiments. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the difference maps was between 15 to 20 Hz. The quality of distortion correction using calculated field maps is comparable to distortion correction done with measured field maps.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that distortion-free echo planar imaging of moving objects may be feasible if prospective motion correction is combined with a field inhomogeneity estimation approach.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20694501     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-010-0225-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  21 in total

Review 1.  Sources of distortion in functional MRI data.

Authors:  P Jezzard; S Clare
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series.

Authors:  J L Andersson; C Hutton; J Ashburner; R Turner; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Three-dimensional numerical simulations of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities in the human head.

Authors:  Trong-Kha Truong; Bradley D Clymer; Donald W Chakeres; Petra Schmalbrock
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Numerical calculations of the static magnetic field in three-dimensional multi-tissue models of the human head.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins; Bei Yang; Qing X Yang; Michael B Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  MRI simulator with object-specific field map calculations.

Authors:  Duane A Yoder; Yansong Zhao; Cynthia B Paschal; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system.

Authors:  M Zaitsev; C Dold; G Sakas; J Hennig; O Speck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Ludovic de Rochefort; Bryan Kressler; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations.

Authors:  P Jezzard; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method.

Authors:  Yu-Chung N Cheng; Jaladhar Neelavalli; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  16 in total

1.  Correction of B 0-induced geometric distortion variations in prospective motion correction for 7T MRI.

Authors:  Uten Yarach; Chaiya Luengviriya; Daniel Stucht; Frank Godenschweger; Peter Schulze; Oliver Speck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions.

Authors:  Maxim Zaitsev; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Prospective motion correction in functional MRI.

Authors:  Maxim Zaitsev; Burak Akin; Pierre LeVan; Benjamin R Knowles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Hybrid prospective and retrospective head motion correction to mitigate cross-calibration errors.

Authors:  Murat Aksoy; Christoph Forman; Matus Straka; Tolga Çukur; Joachim Hornegger; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Motion correction in MRI of the brain.

Authors:  F Godenschweger; U Kägebein; D Stucht; U Yarach; A Sciarra; R Yakupov; F Lüsebrink; P Schulze; O Speck
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Echo-planar imaging with prospective slice-by-slice motion correction using active markers.

Authors:  Melvyn B Ooi; Sascha Krueger; Jordan Muraskin; William J Thomas; Truman R Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for single-shot EPI at 7T.

Authors:  Uten Yarach; Myung-Ho In; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Berkin Bilgic; Frank Godenschweger; Hendrik Mattern; Alessandro Sciarra; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Setup and data analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging of awake cat visual cortex.

Authors:  Manxiu Ma; Chencan Qian; Yanxia Li; Zhentao Zuo; Zuxiang Liu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  Effect of head motion on MRI B0 field distribution.

Authors:  Jiaen Liu; Jacco A de Zwart; Peter van Gelderen; Joseph Murphy-Boesch; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Real-time dynamic frequency and shim correction for single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Brian Keating; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.