Literature DB >> 20694493

The effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the scanning electron microscopic structure and surface roughness of various implant surfaces: an in vitro study.

Seung-Il Shin1, Hyung-Ki Min, Bo-Hyun Park, Young-Hyuk Kwon, Joon-Bong Park, Yeek Herr, Seong-Joo Heo, Jong-Hyuk Chung.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (R(a)) and microscopic change to irradiated dental implant surfaces in vitro and ultimately to determine the proper pulse energy power and application time for the clinical use of Er:YAG lasers. Anodic oxidized surface implants and sand-blasted, large-grit, and acid-etched (SLA) surface implants were used. Each experimental group of implant surfaces included ten implants. Nine implants were used for the laser irradiation test groups and one for the control group. Each test group was equally divided into three subgroups by irradiated pulse energy power. Using an Er:YAG laser, each subgroup of anodic oxidized surface implants was split into 60-, 100-, and 140-mJ/pulse groups, with each subgroup of SLA surface implants irradiated with a 100-, 140-, or 180-mJ/pulse. Three implants in every test subgroup were respectively irradiated for 1, 1.5, and 2 min. The R(a) values for each specimen were recorded and every specimen was observed by SEM. Irradiation by Er:YAG laser led to a decrease in implant surface roughness that was not statistically significant. In anodic oxidized surfaces, the oxidized layer peeled off of the surface, and cracks appeared on implant surfaces in the 100- and 140-mJ/pulse subgroups. However, with SLA surfaces, no significant change in surface texture could be found on any implant surface in the 100- and 140-mJ/pulse subgroups. The melting and fusion phenomena of implant surfaces were observed with all application times with 180 mJ/pulse irradiation. The SLA implant surfaces are stable with laser intensities of less than 140 mJ/pulse and an irradiation time of less than 2 min. The anodic oxidized surfaces were not stable with laser intensities of 100 mJ/pulse when an Er:YAG laser was used to detoxify implant surfaces.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20694493     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-010-0819-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  38 in total

1.  Nonsurgical treatment of moderate and advanced periimplantitis lesions: a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Katrin Bieling; Martin Bonsmann; Thilo Latz; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Periodontal treatment with an Er: YAG laser compared to scaling and root planing. A controlled clinical study.

Authors:  F Schwarz; A Sculean; T Georg; E Reich
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Soft tissue response to plaque formation at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog.

Authors:  I Abrahamsson; T Berglundh; J Lindhe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures.

Authors:  S Matarasso; G Quaremba; F Coraggio; E Vaia; C Cafiero; N P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Antimicrobial effects of 2.94 microm Er:YAG laser radiation on root surfaces: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Matthias Folwaczny; Albert Mehl; Hans Aggstaller; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study.

Authors:  A Rühling; T Kocher; J Kreusch; H C Plagmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  The effect of antimicrobial therapy on periimplantitis lesions. An experimental study in the dog.

Authors:  I Ericsson; L G Persson; T Berglundh; T Edlund; J Lindhe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Chemical treatment of machined titanium surfaces. An in vitro study.

Authors:  A Krozer; J Hall; I Ericsson
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Anton Sculean; Daniel Rothamel; Katja Schwenzer; Thomas Georg; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 10.  Impact of supportive periodontal therapy and implant surface roughness on implant outcome in patients with a history of periodontitis.

Authors:  Marc Quirynen; Marcelo Abarca; Nele Van Assche; Myron Nevins; Daniel van Steenberghe
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Optimal Er:YAG laser irradiation parameters for debridement of microstructured fixture surfaces of titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Yoichi Taniguchi; Akira Aoki; Koji Mizutani; Yasuo Takeuchi; Shizuko Ichinose; Aristeo Atsushi Takasaki; Frank Schwarz; Yuichi Izumi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the surface characteristics of titanium discs: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Esra Ercan; Tuna Arin; Levent Kara; Celal Çandirli; Cihan Uysal
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Physicochemical Changes of Contaminated Titanium Discs Treated With Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Irradiation or Air-Flow Abrasion: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Seyed Massoud Mojahedi; Maedeh Gilvari Sarshari; Zeinab Zamani
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-06

4.  The effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on hydroxyapatite-coated implants and fluoride-modified TiO2-blasted implant surfaces: a microstructural analysis.

Authors:  Seung-Il Shin; Eun-Kwon Lee; Jeong-Hyun Kim; Ji-Hun Lee; Sun-Hee Kim; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Yeek Herr; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Effects of Er:YAG laser on bacteria associated with titanium surfaces and cellular response in vitro.

Authors:  Irmgard Hauser-Gerspach; Corinna Mauth; Tuomas Waltimo; Jürg Meyer; Stefan Stübinger
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  An in vitro evaluation of the responses of human osteoblast-like SaOs-2 cells to SLA titanium surfaces irradiated by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers.

Authors:  Nader Ayobian-Markazi; Tahereh Fourootan; Atieh Zahmatkesh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces.

Authors:  Sigrun Eick; Ivan Meier; Florian Spoerlé; Philip Bender; Akira Aoki; Yuichi Izumi; Giovanni E Salvi; Anton Sculean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Potential Causes of Titanium Particle and Ion Release in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rafael Delgado-Ruiz; Georgios Romanos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation of different titanium surfaces on osteoblast response.

Authors:  Christian Wehner; Markus Laky; Hassan Ali Shokoohi-Tabrizi; Christian Behm; Andreas Moritz; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Oleh Andrukhov
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation for decontamination and its effect on biocompatibility of different titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Peijun Huang; Xue Chen; Zhongren Chen; Min Chen; Jinzhi He; Lin Peng
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.