Literature DB >> 23179305

An in vitro evaluation of the responses of human osteoblast-like SaOs-2 cells to SLA titanium surfaces irradiated by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers.

Nader Ayobian-Markazi1, Tahereh Fourootan, Atieh Zahmatkesh.   

Abstract

Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser treatment is an effective option for the removal of bacterial plaques. Many studies have shown that Er:YAG lasers cannot re-establish the biocompatibility of titanium surfaces. The aim of this study was to evaluate the responses of the human osteoblast-like cell line, SaOs-2, to sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) titanium surface irradiation using different energy settings of an Er:YAG laser by examining cell viability and morphology. Forty SLA titanium disks were irradiated with an Er:YAG laser at a pulse energy of either 60 or 100 mJ with a pulse frequency of 10 Hz under water irrigation and placed in a 24-well plate. Human osteoblast-like SaOs-2 cells were seeded onto the disks in culture media. Cells were then kept in an incubator with 5% carbon dioxide at 37 °C. Each experimental group was divided into two smaller groups to evaluate cell morphology by scanning electron microscope and cell viability using 3-4,5-dimethylthiazol 2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide test. In both the 60 and the 100 mJ experimental groups, spreading morphologies, with numerous cytoplasmic extensions, were observed prominently. Similarly, a majority of cells in the control group exhibited spreading morphologies with abundant cytoplasmic extensions. There were no significant differences among the laser and control groups. The highest cell viability rate was observed in the 100 mJ laser group. No significant differences were observed between the cell viability rates of the two experimental groups (p = 1.00). In contrast, the control group was characterized by a significantly lower cell viability rate (p < 0.001). Treatments with an Er:YAG laser at a pulse energy of either 60 or 100 mJ do not reduce the biocompatibility of SLA titanium surfaces. In fact, modifying SLA surfaces with Er:YAG lasers improved the biocompatibility of these surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179305     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1224-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  32 in total

1.  Osteoblast attachment on titanium disks after laser irradiation.

Authors:  George Romanos; Roberto Crespi; Antonio Barone; Ugo Covani
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  S C Fox; J D Moriarty; R P Kusy
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Characterization of sterilized CP titanium implant surfaces.

Authors:  J C Keller; R A Draughn; J P Wightman; W J Dougherty; S D Meletiou
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Er:YAG laser therapy for peri-implant infection: a histological study.

Authors:  Aristeo Atsushi Takasaki; Akira Aoki; Koji Mizutani; Shigenari Kikuchi; Shigeru Oda; Isao Ishikawa
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  Implant surface preparation.

Authors:  R E Baier; A E Meyer
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The soft tissue response to titanium abutments retrieved from humans and reimplanted in rats. A light microscopic study.

Authors:  L Sennerby; U Lekholm
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation.

Authors:  Zehong Guo; Lei Zhou; Mingdeng Rong; Andi Zhu; Huaou Geng
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Influence of plaque biofilm removal on reestablishment of the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Pascal Papanicolau; Daniel Rothamel; Brigitte Beck; Monika Herten; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Treatment of peri-implantitis by the Vector system.

Authors:  Eva S Karring; Andreas Stavropoulos; Birgit Ellegaard; Thorkild Karring
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Effects of an Er:YAG laser and the Vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium implants in cultures of human osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Daniel Rothamel; Anton Sculean; Thomas Georg; Werner Scherbaum; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of Er: YAG laser irradiation on wettability, surface roughness, and biocompatibility of SLA titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Nader Ayobian-Markazi; Mohammadreza Karimi; Ali Safar-Hajhosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  In vitro biological outcome of laser application for modification or processing of titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Ahmed Hindy; Farzam Farahmand; Fahimeh Sadat Tabatabaei
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Effects of intraperitoneal injection of magnetic graphene oxide on the improvement of acute liver injury induced by CCl4.

Authors:  Tahereh Foroutan; Fatemeh Ahmadi; Fariborze Moayer; Sahar Khalvati
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2020-08-26

4.  Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation of different titanium surfaces on osteoblast response.

Authors:  Christian Wehner; Markus Laky; Hassan Ali Shokoohi-Tabrizi; Christian Behm; Andreas Moritz; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Oleh Andrukhov
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation for decontamination and its effect on biocompatibility of different titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Peijun Huang; Xue Chen; Zhongren Chen; Min Chen; Jinzhi He; Lin Peng
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.