Literature DB >> 2069171

Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.

M J Osberger1, A M Robbins, R T Miyamoto, S W Berry, W A Myres, K S Kessler, M L Pope.   

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was first, to compare the performance of three matched groups of experimental subjects who used either a single-channel cochlear implant, a multichannel cochlear implant, or a two-channel vibrotactile aid on a battery of speech perception measures, and second, to compare the performance of subjects with residual hearing who used hearing aids to that of the three groups of experimental subjects. The results revealed that the subjects using hearing aids achieved the highest scores on all measures. The performance of the group of multichannel implant users was significantly higher than that of the single-channel implant users on tests involving discrimination of speech features, categorization of stress patterns, closed-set identification of familiar words, and identification of common phrases with and without visual cues. The performance of the subjects using 3M/House and Tactaid II devices was similar on all tests except those requiring integration of auditory or tactile cues and visual cues, on which the 3M/House device users achieved significantly higher scores than did the Tactaid II device users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2069171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  9 in total

1.  PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech.

Authors:  D Wong; R T Miyamoto; D B Pisoni; M Sehgal; G D Hutchins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Steven B Chin; Tonya R Bergeson; Jennifer Phan
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Positron emission tomography in cochlear implant and auditory brain stem implant recipients.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; D Wong; D B Pisoni; G Hutchins; M Sehgal; R Fain
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-09

4.  Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Article 1: Long-Term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood: Sample characteristics and data collection methods.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Chris Brenner; Emily A Tobey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Imitative production of rising speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; J Bruce Tomblin; Linda J Spencer; Richard R Hurtig
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Cochlear implants in children.

Authors:  G M O'Donoghue
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  The Perception of Stress Pattern in Young Cochlear Implanted Children: An EEG Study.

Authors:  Niki K Vavatzanidis; Dirk Mürbe; Angela D Friederici; Anja Hahne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals.

Authors:  Aurora Rizza; Alexander V Terekhov; Guglielmo Montone; Marta Olivetti-Belardinelli; J Kevin O'Regan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.