INTRODUCTION: In head and neck cancer patients, weight loss increases morbidity and mortality, and decreases treatment tolerance and quality of life. Early nutritional intervention has beneficial effects on these factors. AIM: We observed patients' weight courses after specialists' care and surveyed nutrition-related documentation by general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: From a Head and Neck Oncology Centre (HNOC) study, 68 patients were asked to participate in an extended general practice cohort. Twenty-six patients participated in the prospective three-monthly weight measurements during the year after HNOC care. We extracted nutritional information contained in referral letters (n = 24) and medical records from the year before referral (n = 45) and after HNOC care (n = 26). An impaired nutritional status was assigned to weight loss > or = 10% within six months or Body Mass Index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2 and 'at risk' to weight loss > or = 5% but < 10% within six months. RESULTS: Three (12%) participants were nutritionally impaired and two (8%) were deemed 'at risk'. Although GPs suspected a (pre-) malignancy in 11 cases (46%), only two (8%) documented weight loss or BMI and four (17%) nutrition-related complaints in their referral letters. Medical records more often contained information on nutrition-related complaints and tube feeding later in the disease course, as opposed to concern over weight loss or BMI. DISCUSSION: Therefore, we call for nutritional management in general practice, by urging practitioners to assess patients' nutritional status throughout the disease course and intervene if necessary. The passing on of related information in case of referral promotes continuity of care.
INTRODUCTION: In head and neck cancerpatients, weight loss increases morbidity and mortality, and decreases treatment tolerance and quality of life. Early nutritional intervention has beneficial effects on these factors. AIM: We observed patients' weight courses after specialists' care and surveyed nutrition-related documentation by general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: From a Head and Neck Oncology Centre (HNOC) study, 68 patients were asked to participate in an extended general practice cohort. Twenty-six patients participated in the prospective three-monthly weight measurements during the year after HNOC care. We extracted nutritional information contained in referral letters (n = 24) and medical records from the year before referral (n = 45) and after HNOC care (n = 26). An impaired nutritional status was assigned to weight loss > or = 10% within six months or Body Mass Index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2 and 'at risk' to weight loss > or = 5% but < 10% within six months. RESULTS: Three (12%) participants were nutritionally impaired and two (8%) were deemed 'at risk'. Although GPs suspected a (pre-) malignancy in 11 cases (46%), only two (8%) documented weight loss or BMI and four (17%) nutrition-related complaints in their referral letters. Medical records more often contained information on nutrition-related complaints and tube feeding later in the disease course, as opposed to concern over weight loss or BMI. DISCUSSION: Therefore, we call for nutritional management in general practice, by urging practitioners to assess patients' nutritional status throughout the disease course and intervene if necessary. The passing on of related information in case of referral promotes continuity of care.
Authors: Koen Huysentruyt; Philippe Alliet; Marc Raes; Julie Willekens; Iris De Schutter; Elke De Wachter; Anne Malfroot; Thierry Devreker; Philippe Goyens; Yvan Vandenplas; Jean De Schepper Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240