| Literature DB >> 29108312 |
Moo-Kon Song1, Joo-Seop Chung2, Ho-Young Yhim3, Sung-Nam Lim4, Seong-Jang Kim5, Yeon-Hee Han6, Hye-Kyung Shim7, Sung-Hoon Jung8, Je-Jung Lee8, Deok-Hwan Yang8.
Abstract
Tumor necrosis (TN) is associated with worse prognosis in several solid cancers. Whether TN predicts poor outcome in natural killer cell / T cell lymphoma (NKTCL) is unclear. We investigated the clinical impact of TN on survival and other novel prognostic parameters in upper aero-digestive tract (UAT) NKTCL of 100 patients with limited stage. TN was significantly associated with poor performance status (p = 0.049), high Korean Prognostic Index score (p = 0.024), high C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (p = 0.003), higher maximum standard uptake value on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (p = 0.008) and higher metabolic tumor volume (MTV) on PET/CT (p < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, progression-free survival and overall survival were independently associated with High MTV status (p = 0.001, p = 0.032), TN (p = 0.018, p = 0.009), local tumor invasiveness (p = 0.007, p = 0.035), complete resection (p = 0.020, p = 0.028) and regional lymph node involvement (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). TN and complete resection are concluded to be novel independent prognostic factors in patients with UAT NKTCL.Entities:
Keywords: complete resection; extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma; prognosis; tumor necrosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29108312 PMCID: PMC5668045 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Baseline characteristics in patients with ENKTL
| Characteristics | Total | TN group | No TN group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 77 (77.0) | 29 (29.0) | 48 (48.0) | 0.541 |
| Female | 23 (23.0) | 12 (12.0) | 11 (11.0) | |
| > 60 years | 45 (45.0) | 20 (20.0) | 25 (25.0) | 0.529 |
| ≤ 60 years | 55 (55.0) | 21 (21.0) | 34 (34.0) | |
| Yes | 31 (31.0) | 16 (16.0) | 15 (15.0) | 0.150 |
| No | 69 (69.0) | 25 (25.0) | 44 (44.0) | |
| ≥ 2 | 12 (12.0) | 8 (8.0) | 4 (4.0) | 0.049 |
| 0-1 | 88 (88.0) | 33 (33.0) | 55 (55.0) | |
| High than normal | 29 (29.0) | 15 (15.0) | 14 (14.0) | 0.166 |
| Normal | 71 (71.0) | 26 (26.0) | 45 (45.0) | |
| Yes | 21 (21.0) | 12 (12.0) | 9 (9.0) | 0.092 |
| No | 79 (79.0) | 29 (29.0) | 50 (50.0) | |
| 0-2 | 91 (91.0) | 35 (35.0) | 56 (56.0) | 0.102 |
| ≥ 3 | 9 (9.0) | 6 (6.0) | 3 (3.0) | |
| Yes | 22 (22.0) | 10 (10.0) | 12 (12.0) | 0.630 |
| No | 78 (78.0) | 31 (31.0) | 47 (47.0) | |
| High KPI score ≥ 3 points | 11 (11.0) | 8 (8.0) | 3 (3.0) | 0.024 |
| High GPS (2 points) | 31 (31.0) | 17 (17.0) | 14 (14.0) | 0.061 |
| High CAR | 22 (22.0) | 15 (15.0) | 7 (7.0) | 0.003 |
| Median (range) | 6.4 (2.9-22.3) | 8.4 (2.9-21.1) | 5.2 (3.1-22.3) | 0.008 |
| Median (range) | 36.2 (5.1-1164.9) | 84.5 (5.1-1164.9) | 32.8 (6.2-337.0) | <0.001 |
| 37 (37.0) | 13 (13.0) | 24 (24.0) | 0.363 | |
| CMT | 8 (8.0) | 3 (3.0) | 5 (5.0) | 0.399 |
| Chemotherapy only | 29 (29.0) | 10 (10.0) | 19 (19.0) | |
| 63 (63.0) | 28 (28.0) | 35 (25.0) | 0.363 | |
| CMT | 56 (56.0) | 26 (26.0) | 30 (30.0) | 0.490 |
| Chemotherapy only | 7 (7.0) | 2 (2.0) | 5 (5.0) |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; IPI, International Prognostic Index; SUVmax, maximum standard uptake value; PET/CT, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography, CMT, combined modality treatment (concurrent chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy)
Figure 1Comparisons of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to tumor necrosis (TN) and complete resection in patients with NK/T cell lymphoma (NKTCL)
PFS and OS of TN group were inferior compared with no TN group in patients with NKTCL (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, Figure 1A & 1B). Meanwhile, survivals of complete resection group were superior compared with no complete resection group in the patients (p = 0.009, p = 0.002, Figure 1C & 1D).
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with ENKTL
| Progression-free survival | Overall survival | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||||
| 0.515 | — | — | 0.605 | — | — | |
| 0.607 | — | — | 0.504 | — | — | |
| 0.034 | 2.093 (0.780-5.614) | 0.142 | 0.045 | 0.891 (0.354-2.239) | 0.805 | |
| 0.047 | 0.804 (0.274-2.354) | 0.690 | 0.021 | 0.693 (0.208-2.307) | 0.550 | |
| 0.002 | 1.796 (0.881-3.663) | 0.107 | 0.007 | 0.614 (0.257-1.468) | 0.273 | |
| <0.001 | 3.810 (1.751-8.293) | 0.001 | <0.001 | 2.473 (1.492-6.162) | 0.032 | |
| <0.001 | 3.015 (1.210-7.508) | 0.018 | <0.001 | 3.482 (1.365-8.888) | 0.009 | |
| <0.001 | 2.962 (1.347-6.513) | 0.007 | <0.001 | 2.484 (1.067-5.787) | 0.035 | |
| 0.009 | 0.299 (0.108-0.829) | 0.020 | 0.002 | 0.305 (0.106-0.879) | 0.028 | |
| <0.001 | 5.728 (2.428-13.513) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 5.037 (2.284-11.203) | <0.001 | |
| 0.017 | 0.408 (0.148-1.122) | 0.082 | 0.018 | 1.301 (0.417-4.057) | 0.650 | |
| 0.012 | 0.685 (0.187-2.510) | 0.568 | 0.033 | 0.407 (0.102-1.620) | 0.202 | |
| <0.001 | 2.038 (0.849-4.881) | 0.111 | <0.001 | 1.461 (0.591-3.611) | 0.411 | |
| 0.009 | 0.853 (0.393-1.848) | 0.686 | 0.007 | 1.758 (0.792-3.902) | 0.165 | |
LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ECOG, Eastern Cooperattive Group; PS, performance status; EN, extranodal; SUVmax, maximum standard uptake value; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; LN, lymph node; KPI, Korean Prognostic Index; CAR, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score.
Figure 2Comparisons of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to extent of tumor necrosis (TN) and combined two factors such as TN and complete resection in patients with NK/T cell lymphoma (NKTCL)
Each PFS and OS among three groups divided according to extent of TN was significantly different in patients with NKTCL (PFS & OS between No TN & low NTV group, p = 0.027 & p = 0.007; PFS & OS between low NTV and high NTV group, p = 0.004 & p = 0.025, Figure 2A & 2B). Meanwhile, in comparisons according to combined two factors including TN and complete resection, TN group not received complete resection had lowest PFS and OS than other three groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, Figure 2C & 2D).