Literature DB >> 30267142

18F-FDG Metabolic Tumor Volume: Association with Short- and Long-Term Feeding Tube Use in Head and Neck IMRT.

James E Jackson1,2,3,4, Nigel J Anderson5,6, Maureen Rolfo5, Morikatsu Wada5, Michal Schneider7, Michael Poulsen8,9, Maziar Fahandej5, Anna Huynh8, Sze Ting Lee10, Daryl Lim Joon5, Vincent Khoo5,7,11,12.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of head and neck primary tumors may be a significant prognostic factor for feeding tube (FT) use and FT dependence. Seventy-nine patients with evaluable primary tumors, pre-therapy FDG-PET scans, treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (± concurrent chemotherapy) for head and neck mucosal cancers were included. MTV was quantified and recorded for the primary lesion using a minimum standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold of 2.0. Patients were recommended prophylactic FT and followed up by a dietician for at least eight weeks of post-radiotherapy. Associations between MTV, dose to swallowing organs at risk, FT use, and FT dependence were analyzed. MTV was positively correlated with gross tumor volume (GTV) (r = 0.7357; p < 0.0001). MTVs larger than 17 cc were associated with higher rates of FT use (87.8% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.0067) and FT dependence at six weeks (76.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.0024) and six months (25.0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.0088). Increasing MTV was associated with increasing mean dose to the oral cavity (p = < 0.0001), tongue base (p = 0.0009), and superior (SPCM) (p = 0.0001) and middle pharyngeal constrictor muscles (MPCM) (p = 0.0005). Increasing MTV was associated with increasing maximum dose to oral cavity (p = 0.0028), tongue base (p = 0.0056), SPCM (p = 0.0037), and MPCM (p = 0.0085). Pre-treatment MTV is a reproducible parameter that can be generated at or prior to a pre-treatment Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and may expedite decisions regarding placement of prophylactic FTs. Prospective evaluation in larger series is required to determine whether MTV is a more useful prognostic variable for FT use than clinical T-classification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enteral nutrition; Head & neck neoplasms; Positron-emission tomography; Radiotherapy; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267142     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-018-9946-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  44 in total

1.  Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Kian Ang; Wilfried Budach; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Johannes A Langendijk; Anne Lee; Quynh-Thu Le; Philippe Maingon; Chris Nutting; Brian O'Sullivan; Sandro V Porceddu; Benoit Lengele
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  "Pharyngocise": randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Giselle Carnaby-Mann; Michael A Crary; Ilona Schmalfuss; Robert Amdur
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Metabolic tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated definitively for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Percy Lee; Jose G Bazan; Philip W Lavori; Dilani K Weerasuriya; Andrew Quon; Quynh-Thu Le; Heather A Wakelee; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Nutritional consequences of radiotherapy in nasopharynx cancer patients.

Authors:  Kenway Ng; Sing Fai Leung; Philip J Johnson; Jean Woo
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.900

5.  Cystic lymph node metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer: An HPV-associated phenomenon.

Authors:  David Goldenberg; Shahnaz Begum; William H Westra; Zubair Khan; James Sciubba; Sara I Pai; Joseph A Califano; Ralph P Tufano; Wayne M Koch
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Clinical significance of pretreatment metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Jong-Lyel Roh; Jae Seung Kim; Byung Chul Kang; Kyung-Ja Cho; Sang-wook Lee; Sung-Bae Kim; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Dose intensity comparison between weekly and 3-weekly Cisplatin delivered concurrently with radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a retrospective comparison from New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.

Authors:  Kean F Ho; Ric Swindell; Caroline V Brammer
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Prospective risk-adjusted [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography assessment of radiation response in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin J Moeller; Vishal Rana; Blake A Cannon; Michelle D Williams; Erich M Sturgis; Lawrence E Ginsberg; Homer A Macapinlac; J Jack Lee; K Kian Ang; K S Clifford Chao; Gregory M Chronowski; Steven J Frank; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Randal S Weber; Adam S Garden; Scott M Lippman; David L Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Enteral feeding tubes in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a critical review.

Authors:  Shlomo A Koyfman; David J Adelstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossola
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.