OBJECTIVE: Loss of lean body mass with aging may contribute to falls and fractures. The objective of this analysis was to determine if taking postmenopausal hormone therapy (or HT: estrogen plus progestogen therapy or estrogen therapy alone) favorably affects age-related changes in lean body mass and if these changes partially account for decreased falls or fractures with HT. METHODS: Participants randomly assigned to either estrogen plus progestogen therapy (n = 543) or control (n = 471) and estrogen therapy alone (n = 453) or control (n = 474) and receiving dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans to estimate body composition during the Women's Health Initiative were evaluated. Falls and fracture occurrence were obtained by annual self-report. Fractures were confirmed by a clinical chart review. RESULTS: At 6 years postrandomization, lean body mass was not different between HT and control groups. Although lean body mass positively influenced bone mineral density, independent of HT status, the preserved lean body mass observed in the HT arms in the first 3 years did not significantly contribute to models evaluating HT influence on falls and fractures between years 3 and 6. Women taking at least 80% of their medication in the HT arms demonstrated fewer falls compared with placebo; this difference was not attributable to change in lean body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Despite early preservation of lean body mass with HT (3 y), HT did not ameliorate long-term (6 y) loss in lean body mass with aging.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Loss of lean body mass with aging may contribute to falls and fractures. The objective of this analysis was to determine if taking postmenopausal hormone therapy (or HT: estrogen plus progestogen therapy or estrogen therapy alone) favorably affects age-related changes in lean body mass and if these changes partially account for decreased falls or fractures with HT. METHODS:Participants randomly assigned to either estrogen plus progestogen therapy (n = 543) or control (n = 471) and estrogen therapy alone (n = 453) or control (n = 474) and receiving dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans to estimate body composition during the Women's Health Initiative were evaluated. Falls and fracture occurrence were obtained by annual self-report. Fractures were confirmed by a clinical chart review. RESULTS: At 6 years postrandomization, lean body mass was not different between HT and control groups. Although lean body mass positively influenced bone mineral density, independent of HT status, the preserved lean body mass observed in the HT arms in the first 3 years did not significantly contribute to models evaluating HT influence on falls and fractures between years 3 and 6. Women taking at least 80% of their medication in the HT arms demonstrated fewer falls compared with placebo; this difference was not attributable to change in lean body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Despite early preservation of lean body mass with HT (3 y), HT did not ameliorate long-term (6 y) loss in lean body mass with aging.
Authors: R N Baumgartner; K M Koehler; D Gallagher; L Romero; S B Heymsfield; R R Ross; P J Garry; R D Lindeman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1998-04-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; A S Leon; D R Jacobs; H J Montoye; J F Sallis; R S Paffenbarger Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Cynthia K Sites; Georgia D L'Hommedieu; Michael J Toth; Martin Brochu; Brian C Cooper; Penny A Fairhurst Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jane A Cauley; John Robbins; Zhao Chen; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca D Jackson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Meryl LeBoff; Cora E Lewis; Joan McGowan; Joan Neuner; Mary Pettinger; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nelson B Watts Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Garnet L Anderson; Marian Limacher; Annlouise R Assaf; Tamsen Bassford; Shirley A A Beresford; Henry Black; Denise Bonds; Robert Brunner; Robert Brzyski; Bette Caan; Rowan Chlebowski; David Curb; Margery Gass; Jennifer Hays; Gerardo Heiss; Susan Hendrix; Barbara V Howard; Judith Hsia; Allan Hubbell; Rebecca Jackson; Karen C Johnson; Howard Judd; Jane Morley Kotchen; Lewis Kuller; Andrea Z LaCroix; Dorothy Lane; Robert D Langer; Norman Lasser; Cora E Lewis; JoAnn Manson; Karen Margolis; Judith Ockene; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Lawrence Phillips; Ross L Prentice; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; John Robbins; Jacques E Rossouw; Gloria Sarto; Marcia L Stefanick; Linda Van Horn; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Robert Wallace; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Caitlin M Fearing; David W Melton; Xiufen Lei; Heather Hancock; Hanzhou Wang; Zaheer U Sarwar; Laurel Porter; Matthew McHale; Linda M McManus; Paula K Shireman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Stacy T Sims; Jessica Kubo; Manisha Desai; Jennifer Bea; Jeannette M Beasley; Joann E Manson; Matthew Allison; Rebecca A Seguin; Zhao Chen; Yvonne L Michael; Shannon D Sullivan; Shirley Beresford; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Tatiana Moro; Camille R Brightwell; Danielle E Phalen; Colleen F McKenna; Samantha J Lane; Craig Porter; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen; Christopher S Fry Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Jennifer W Bea; Cynthia A Thomson; Robert B Wallace; Chunyuan Wu; Rebecca A Seguin; Scott B Going; Andrea LaCroix; Charles Eaton; Judith K Ockene; Michael J LaMonte; Rebecca Jackson; W Jerry Mysiw; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Bernhard Haring; Mary Pettinger; Jennifer W Bea; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Ryan M Carnahan; Judith K Ockene; Moritz Wyler von Ballmoos; Robert B Wallace; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 3.921