Literature DB >> 20687050

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery; a useful tool in resident training--the Peoria experience, 2002-2009.

Franziska Huettner1, Danuta Dynda, Michael Ryan, Jamie Doubet, David L Crawford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the use of robotic-assisted general surgery at our institution. We evaluated the 8 year experience of one minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship-trained surgeon in Peoria, IL, performing 240 cases of foregut, colon, solid organ and biliary surgery using the da Vinci system, with resident assistance. Foregut and colon procedures are the fifth and sixth most commonly performed procedures of the senior author annually.
METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of prospectively collected data representing 124 foregut and 102 colon operations was performed. Data analysed were procedure performed and indications for surgery, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), port set-up time (PST), robot operating time (ROT), total case time (TCT), length of stay (LOS), complications, conversions and resident involvement were recorded. Fourteen cases were excluded from the data review. Statistical analysis using the ANOVA test was applied. A specific review of resident participation was performed.
RESULTS: Times for 226 foregut and colon cases were: PST 31.2 ± 9.4 (range 10-64) min, ROT 119.3 ± 41.5 (range 12-306) min, and TCT 194.8 ± 50.3 (range 50-380) min. The EBL was 48.6 ± 55.0 (range 5-500) ml, BMI 28.5 ± 4.7 (range 15.4-46.8) kg/m(2) , and median LOS 2.0 (range 0-27) days. The overall complication rate was 13.3%. No deaths occurred. Over the 8 year study period the number of cases participated in by residents was 0, 16, 22, 15, 29, 26, 28 and 10 (as of June 2009), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for the foregut and colon in a clinical setting where the surgeon does far more of other types of MIS. This series compares favorably with the literature. Incorporation of robotic training in the curriculum has allowed residents to learn robotic techniques in an effective manner.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20687050     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  10 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Turchetti; Ilaria Palla; Francesca Pierotti; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted gastroesophageal surgery: usefulness and limitations.

Authors:  Ismael Diez Del Val; Cándido Martinez Blazquez; Carlos Loureiro Gonzalez; Jose Maria Vitores Lopez; Valentin Sierra Esteban; Julen Barrenetxea Asua; Izaskun Del Hoyo Aretxabala; Patricia Perez de Villarreal; Jose Esteban Bilbao Axpe; Jaime Jesus Mendez Martin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-09-14

Review 3.  Evolution and literature review of robotic general surgery resident training 2002-2018.

Authors:  David L Crawford; Anthony Michael Dwyer
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-27

4.  Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Omar Hyder; Adil H Haider; Melissa Camp; Anne Lidor; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Gary B Deutsch; Sandeep Anantha Sathyanarayana; Vikraman Gunabushanam; Nitin Mishra; Eugene Rubach; Harry Zemon; Jonathan D S Klein; George Denoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Contribution of robotics to minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Ismael Diez Del Val; Carlos Loureiro Gonzalez; Santiago Larburu Etxaniz; Julen Barrenetxea Asua; Saioa Leturio Fernandez; Sandra Ruiz Carballo; Eider Etxebarria Beitia; Patricia Perez de Villarreal; Lorena Hierro-Olabarria; Jose Esteban Bilbao Axpe; Jaime Jesus Mendez Martin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

7.  Telerobotic-assisted bone-drilling system using bilateral control with feed operation scaling and cutting force scaling.

Authors:  Yusuke Kasahara; Hiromasa Kawana; Shin Usuda; Kouhei Ohnishi
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.547

8.  Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Stephanie Honey; Natasha Alvarado; Joanne Greenhalgh; Jon Hindmarsh; Alan Pearman; David Jayne; Peter Gardner; Arron Gill; Alwyn Kotze; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The impact of training residents on the outcome of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Bedaiwy; Mohamed Abdelrahman; Stephanie Deter; Tarek Farghaly; Mahmoud M Shalaby; Heidi Frasure; Sangeeta Mahajan
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-11-01

10.  A Standardized Robotic Training Curriculum in a General Surgery Program.

Authors:  Harley Moit; Anthony Dwyer; Michelle De Sutter; Sally Heinzel; David Crawford
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.