Literature DB >> 20684450

Evaluation of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation for use in combat operations more than 12 hours after injury.

Rodney L Coldren1, Mark P Kelly, Robert V Parish, Michael Dretsch, Michael L Russell.   

Abstract

The diagnosis and management of concussion can be difficult in a combat environment, especially in the absence of loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia. As no validated test exists to diagnose or grade neurocognitive impairment from a concussion, the military currently employs the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) in Iraq. This is a two-part test, which incorporates the standardized assessment of concussion (SAC) as its objective score, although it has not been shown to be valid unless administered shortly after injury. A research team deployed to Iraq between January and April 2009 to examine the validity of several tests of neurocognitive function following a concussion, including the MACE. When administered more than 12 hours after the concussive injury, the MACE lacked sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be clinically useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20684450     DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  14 in total

Review 1.  Update on TBI and Cognitive Impairment in Military Veterans.

Authors:  Gregory A Elder
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Assessment, management and knowledge of sport-related concussion: systematic review.

Authors:  Doug King; Matt Brughelli; Patria Hume; Conor Gissane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The King-Devick test as a determinant of head trauma and concussion in boxers and MMA fighters.

Authors:  K M Galetta; J Barrett; M Allen; F Madda; D Delicata; A T Tennant; C C Branas; M G Maguire; L V Messner; S Devick; S L Galetta; L J Balcer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Sports-related concussion testing.

Authors:  Mark S Dziemianowicz; Matthew P Kirschen; Bryan A Pukenas; Eric Laudano; Laura J Balcer; Steven L Galetta
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Dynamic motor tracking is sensitive to subacute mTBI.

Authors:  Michael S Fine; Peter S Lum; Elizabeth B Brokaw; Matthew S Caywood; Anthony J Metzger; Alexander V Libin; Jill Terner; Jack W Tsao; Jacob N Norris; David Milzman; Diane Williams; Jeff Colombe; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A Brief Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment to evaluate concussions: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; R J Elbin; Joseph M Furman; Cara Troutman-Enseki; Ryan M DeWolf; Greg Marchetti; Anthony P Kontos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The utility of the King-Devick test as a sideline assessment tool for sport-related concussions: a narrative review.

Authors:  Scott Howitt; Robert Brommer; Justin Fowler; Logan Gerwing; Julian Payne; Christopher DeGraauw
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2016-12

8.  The diagnosis of traumatic brain injury on the battlefield.

Authors:  Kara E Schmid; Frank C Tortella
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Effect Size as the Essential Statistic in Developing Methods for mTBI Diagnosis.

Authors:  Douglas Brandt Gibson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Concussion Assessment With Smartglasses: Validation Study of Balance Measurement Toward a Lightweight, Multimodal, Field-Ready Platform.

Authors:  Joseph P Salisbury; Neha U Keshav; Anthony D Sossong; Ned T Sahin
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.