PURPOSE: A Phase II study to screen for anti-melanoma activity of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, 17-AAG (17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin) was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of disease stabilisation in patients with progressive, metastatic melanoma treated with 17-AAG. Secondary endpoints were to determine: the toxicity of 17-AAG, the duration of response(s), median survival and further study the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 17-AAG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic melanoma (progressive disease documented ≤6 months of entering study) were treated with weekly, intravenous 17-AAG. A Simon one sample two stage minimax design was used. A stable disease rate of ≥25% at 6 months was considered compatible with 17-AAG having activity. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (8 male: 6 female) were entered, eleven received 17-AAG (performance status 0 or 1). Median age was 60 (range 29-81) years. The majority (93%) received prior chemotherapy and had stage M1c disease (71%). Toxicity was rarely ≥ Grade 2 in severity and commonly included fatigue, headache and gastrointestinal disturbances. One of eleven patients treated with 17-AAG had stable disease for 6 months and median survival for all patients was 173 days. The study was closed prematurely prior to completion of the first stage of recruitment and limited planned pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. CONCLUSION: Some evidence of 17-AAG activity was observed although early study termination meant study endpoints were not reached. Stable disease rates can be incorporated into trials screening for anti-melanoma activity and further study of HSP90 inhibitors in melanoma should be considered.
PURPOSE: A Phase II study to screen for anti-melanoma activity of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, 17-AAG (17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin) was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of disease stabilisation in patients with progressive, metastatic melanoma treated with 17-AAG. Secondary endpoints were to determine: the toxicity of 17-AAG, the duration of response(s), median survival and further study the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 17-AAG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic melanoma (progressive disease documented ≤6 months of entering study) were treated with weekly, intravenous 17-AAG. A Simon one sample two stage minimax design was used. A stable disease rate of ≥25% at 6 months was considered compatible with 17-AAG having activity. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (8 male: 6 female) were entered, eleven received 17-AAG (performance status 0 or 1). Median age was 60 (range 29-81) years. The majority (93%) received prior chemotherapy and had stage M1c disease (71%). Toxicity was rarely ≥ Grade 2 in severity and commonly included fatigue, headache and gastrointestinal disturbances. One of eleven patients treated with 17-AAG had stable disease for 6 months and median survival for all patients was 173 days. The study was closed prematurely prior to completion of the first stage of recruitment and limited planned pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. CONCLUSION: Some evidence of 17-AAG activity was observed although early study termination meant study endpoints were not reached. Stable disease rates can be incorporated into trials screening for anti-melanoma activity and further study of HSP90 inhibitors in melanoma should be considered.
Authors: Udai Banerji; Anne O'Donnell; Michelle Scurr; Simon Pacey; Sarah Stapleton; Yasmin Asad; Laura Simmons; Alison Maloney; Florence Raynaud; Maeli Campbell; Michael Walton; Sunil Lakhani; Stanley Kaye; Paul Workman; Ian Judson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David B Solit; Fuzhong F Zheng; Maria Drobnjak; Pamela N Münster; Brian Higgins; David Verbel; Glenn Heller; William Tong; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; David B Agus; Howard I Scher; Neal Rosen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Victoria Smith; Edward A Sausville; Richard F Camalier; Heinz-Herbert Fiebig; Angelika M Burger Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: David B Solit; S Percy Ivy; Catherine Kopil; Rachel Sikorski; Michael J Morris; Susan F Slovin; W Kevin Kelly; Anthony DeLaCruz; Tracy Curley; Glenn Heller; Steven Larson; Lawrence Schwartz; Merrill J Egorin; Neal Rosen; Howard I Scher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Javier Moreno-Farre; Yasmin Asad; Simon Pacey; Paul Workman; Florence I Raynaud Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Stephanie M Cohen; Ridhwi Mukerji; Abbas K Samadi; Xuan Zhang; Huiping Zhao; Brian S J Blagg; Mark S Cohen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Delphine R Boulbes; Stefan T Arold; Gaurav B Chauhan; Korina V Blachno; Nanfu Deng; Wei-Chao Chang; Quanri Jin; Tzu-Hsuan Huang; Jung-Mao Hsu; Samuel W Brady; Chandra Bartholomeusz; John E Ladbury; Steve Stone; Dihua Yu; Mien-Chie Hung; Francisco J Esteva Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 6.603