UNLABELLED: We compared (68)Ga-DOTA-F(ab')(2)-herceptin (DOTA is 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid [HER2 PET]) and (18)F-FDG PET for imaging of tumor response to the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG). METHODS: Mice bearing BT474 breast tumor xenografts were scanned with (18)F-FDG PET and HER2 PET before and after 17AAG treatment and then biweekly for up to 3 wk. RESULTS: Within 24 h after treatment, a significant decrease in HER2 was measured by HER2 PET, whereas (18)F-FDG PET uptake, a measure of glycolysis, was unchanged. Marked growth inhibition occurred in treated tumors but became evident only by 11 d after treatment. Thus, Her2 downregulation occurs independently of changes in glycolysis after 17AAG therapy, and Her2 reduction more accurately predicts subsequent tumor growth inhibition. CONCLUSION: HER2 PET is an earlier predictor of tumor response to 17AAG therapy than (18)F-FDG PET.
UNLABELLED: We compared (68)Ga-DOTA-F(ab')(2)-herceptin (DOTA is 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid [HER2 PET]) and (18)F-FDG PET for imaging of tumor response to the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG). METHODS:Mice bearing BT474 breast tumor xenografts were scanned with (18)F-FDG PET and HER2 PET before and after 17AAG treatment and then biweekly for up to 3 wk. RESULTS: Within 24 h after treatment, a significant decrease in HER2 was measured by HER2 PET, whereas (18)F-FDG PET uptake, a measure of glycolysis, was unchanged. Marked growth inhibition occurred in treated tumors but became evident only by 11 d after treatment. Thus, Her2 downregulation occurs independently of changes in glycolysis after 17AAG therapy, and Her2 reduction more accurately predicts subsequent tumor growth inhibition. CONCLUSION:HER2 PET is an earlier predictor of tumor response to 17AAG therapy than (18)F-FDG PET.
Authors: R E Jimenez; M Hussain; F J Bianco; U Vaishampayan; P Tabazcka; W A Sakr; J E Pontes; D P Wood; D J Grignon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael J Morris; Victor E Reuter; W Kevin Kelly; Susan F Slovin; Kate Kenneson; David Verbel; Iman Osman; Howard I Scher Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H Safran; M Steinhoff; S Mangray; R Rathore; T C King; L Chai; K Berzein; T Moore; D Iannitti; P Reiss; T Pasquariello; P Akerman; D Quirk; R Mass; L Goldstein; U Tantravahi Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich Journal: Radiologe Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Diane E Milenic; Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Tapan K Nayak; Celeste A S Regino; Kayhan Garmestani; Martin W Brechbiel Journal: MAbs Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Craig J Galbán; Stefanie Galbán; Marcian E Van Dort; Gary D Luker; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.622
Authors: Smitha Reddy; Calvin C Shaller; Mohan Doss; Irina Shchaveleva; James D Marks; Jian Q Yu; Matthew K Robinson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M A Pantaleo; S Fanti; M Nannini; S Boschi; C Nanni; A Maleddu; D Rubello; G Biasco Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 2.860