PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered using continuous and intermittent dosing schedules. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with progressive solid tumor malignancies were treated with 17-AAG using an accelerated titration dose escalation schema. The starting dose and schedule were 5 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days with cycles repeated every 21 days. Dosing modifications based on safety, pharmacodynamic modeling, and clinical outcomes led to the evaluation of the following schedules: daily x 3 repeated every 14 days; twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, and 11) for 2 weeks every 3 weeks; and twice weekly (days 1 and 4) without interruption. During cycle 1, blood was collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. RESULTS: Fifty-four eligible patients were treated. The MTD was schedule dependent: 56 mg/m(2) on the daily x 5 schedule; 112 mg/m(2) on the daily x 3 schedule; and 220 mg/m(2) on the days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every-21-day schedule. Continuous twice-weekly dosing was deemed too toxic because of delayed hepatotoxicity. Hepatic toxicity was also dose limiting with the daily x 5 schedule. Other common toxicities encountered were fatigue, myalgias, and nausea. This latter adverse effect may have been attributable, in part, to the DMSO-based formulation. Concentrations of 17-AAG above those required for activity in preclinical models could be safely achieved in plasma. Induction of a heat shock response and down-regulation of Akt and Raf-1 were observed in biomarker studies. CONCLUSION: The MTD and toxicity profile of 17-AAG were schedule dependent. Intermittent dosing schedules were less toxic and are recommended for future phase II studies.
PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered using continuous and intermittent dosing schedules. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with progressive solid tumor malignancies were treated with 17-AAG using an accelerated titration dose escalation schema. The starting dose and schedule were 5 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days with cycles repeated every 21 days. Dosing modifications based on safety, pharmacodynamic modeling, and clinical outcomes led to the evaluation of the following schedules: daily x 3 repeated every 14 days; twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, and 11) for 2 weeks every 3 weeks; and twice weekly (days 1 and 4) without interruption. During cycle 1, blood was collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. RESULTS: Fifty-four eligible patients were treated. The MTD was schedule dependent: 56 mg/m(2) on the daily x 5 schedule; 112 mg/m(2) on the daily x 3 schedule; and 220 mg/m(2) on the days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every-21-day schedule. Continuous twice-weekly dosing was deemed too toxic because of delayed hepatotoxicity. Hepatic toxicity was also dose limiting with the daily x 5 schedule. Other common toxicities encountered were fatigue, myalgias, and nausea. This latter adverse effect may have been attributable, in part, to the DMSO-based formulation. Concentrations of 17-AAG above those required for activity in preclinical models could be safely achieved in plasma. Induction of a heat shock response and down-regulation of Akt and Raf-1 were observed in biomarker studies. CONCLUSION: The MTD and toxicity profile of 17-AAG were schedule dependent. Intermittent dosing schedules were less toxic and are recommended for future phase II studies.
Authors: O M Grbovic; A D Basso; A Sawai; Q Ye; P Friedlander; D Solit; N Rosen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-12-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nivedita Sain; Bhavani Krishnan; Michael G Ormerod; Assunta De Rienzo; Wai M Liu; Stanley B Kaye; Paul Workman; Ann L Jackman Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Ami Citri; Iris Alroy; Sara Lavi; Chanan Rubin; Wanping Xu; Nicolas Grammatikakis; Cam Patterson; Len Neckers; David W Fry; Yosef Yarden Journal: EMBO J Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: David B Solit; Fuzhong F Zheng; Maria Drobnjak; Pamela N Münster; Brian Higgins; David Verbel; Glenn Heller; William Tong; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; David B Agus; Howard I Scher; Neal Rosen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Andrea D Basso; David B Solit; Gabriela Chiosis; Banabihari Giri; Philip Tsichlis; Neal Rosen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-08-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Alison R Walker; Rebecca Klisovic; Jeffrey S Johnston; Yao Jiang; Susan Geyer; Cheryl Kefauver; Philip Binkley; John C Byrd; Michael R Grever; Ramiro Garzon; Mitch A Phelps; Guido Marcucci; Kristie A Blum; William Blum Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2013-01-24
Authors: Joleen Hubbard; Charles Erlichman; David O Toft; Rui Qin; Bridget A Stensgard; Sara Felten; Cynthia Ten Eyck; Gretchen Batzel; S Percy Ivy; Paul Haluska Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 3.850