Literature DB >> 22526175

[Pyeloplasty: pro laparoscopic].

P Bader1.   

Abstract

With increasing experience and availability of the da Vinci® robotic surgery system there has been an extension of the indications from initially exclusively ablative interventions, such as nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy to reconstructive interventions, such as pyeloplasty, bladder augmentation and urinary diversion. Laparocopic pyeloplasty has been established for both adults and children, with results comparable to the open procedure. In comparison the conventional laparoscopic procedure is little cost-intensive and therefore widely used. The available literature has to be analysed to find advantages for the cost-intensive, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty from which patients can profit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526175     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2860-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  32 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first decade.

Authors:  Adebanji B Adeyoju; David Hrouda; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  [Reconstructive procedures in laparoscopic urology].

Authors:  G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Pediatric pyeloplasty: comparison of literature meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open techniques with open surgery at a single institution.

Authors:  Stéfanie A Seixas-Mikelus; Lawrence C Jenkins; Pierre Williot; Saul P Greenfield
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multicentric comparative study of techniques and accesses.

Authors:  Roberto Vaz Juliano; Rafaela R Mendonça; Fernando Meyer; Maurício Rubinstein; Marco Túlio Coelho Lasmar; Fernando Korkes; Alessandro Tavares; Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  Percutaneous surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (endopyelotomy): technique and early results.

Authors:  G Badlani; M Eshghi; A D Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Endopyelotomy and endoureterotomy with the acucise ureteral cutting balloon device: preliminary experience.

Authors:  P S Chandhoke; R V Clayman; A M Stone; E M McDougall; T Buelna; N Hilal; M Chang; M J Stegwell
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Complete daVinci versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: cost analysis.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Richard E Link; John M Varkarakis; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  H Christoph Klingler; Mesut Remzi; Guenter Janetschek; Christian Kratzik; Michael J Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  [History of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair (pyeloplasty). From Trendelenburg (1886) to the present].

Authors:  V Poulakis; U Witzsch; D Schultheiss; P Rathert; E Becht
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.