Literature DB >> 20683416

The inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts survival in patients with cervical cancer.

Stephan Polterauer1, Christoph Grimm, Veronika Seebacher, Jasmin Rahhal, Clemens Tempfer, Alexander Reinthaller, Lukas Hefler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) is known to reflect the degree of tumor-associated cachexia and inflammation and is associated with survival in various malignancies. We investigated the value of the GPS in patients with cervical cancer.
METHODS: We included 244 consecutive patients with cervical cancer in our study. The pretherapeutic GPS was calculated as follows: patients with elevated C-reactive protein serum levels (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/L) were allocated a score of 2, and patients with 1 or no abnormal value were allocated a score of 1 or 0, respectively. The association between GPS and survival was evaluated by univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression models. The GPS was correlated with clinicopathologic parameters as shown by performing chi2 tests.
RESULTS: In univariate analyses, GPS (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), and lymph node involvement (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), but not patients' age (P = 0.2, P = 0.07), histological grade (P = 0.08, P = 0.1), and histological type (P = 0.8, P = 0.9), were associated with disease-free and overall survival, respectively. In a multivariate analysis GPS (P = 0.03, P = 0.04), FIGO stage (P = 0.006, P = 0.006), and lymph node involvement (P = 0.003, P = 0.002), but not patients' age (P = 0.5, P = 0.5), histological grade (P = 0.7, P = 0.6), and histological type (P = 0.4, P = 0.6) were associated with disease-free and overall survival, respectively. The GPS was associated with FIGO stage (P < 0.001) and histological grade (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The GPS can be used as an inflammation-based predictor for survival in patients with cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20683416     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181e64bb1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  19 in total

1.  Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) can be a useful indicator to determine prognosis of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tadahiro Nozoe; Rumi Matono; Hideki Ijichi; Takefumi Ohga; Takahiro Ezaki
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

2.  Intravenous ascorbic acid to prevent and treat cancer-associated sepsis?

Authors:  Thomas E Ichim; Boris Minev; Todd Braciak; Brandon Luna; Ron Hunninghake; Nina A Mikirova; James A Jackson; Michael J Gonzalez; Jorge R Miranda-Massari; Doru T Alexandrescu; Constantin A Dasanu; Vladimir Bogin; Janis Ancans; R Brian Stevens; Boris Markosian; James Koropatnick; Chien-Shing Chen; Neil H Riordan
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Modified Glasgow prognostic score is an independent prognostic factor in patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yan Xiao; Ying-Kun Ren; Hui-Jun Cheng; Li Wang; Su-Xia Luo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

4.  Prognostic significance of preoperative Naples prognostic score on short- and long-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma.

Authors:  Jikuan Jin; Hebin Wang; Feng Peng; Xiaoxiang Wang; Min Wang; Feng Zhu; Guangbing Xiong; Renyi Qin
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  An MRI-based radiomics signature and clinical characteristics for survival prediction in early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ru-Ru Zheng; Meng-Ting Cai; Li Lan; Xiao Wan Huang; Yun Jun Yang; Martin Powell; Feng Lin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A high Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) or modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) predicts poor prognosis in gynecologic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Nie; Lingping Zhang; Chunyan Wang; Qian Guo; Xiguang Mao
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Prognostic factors associated with early mortality after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bong Jun Kwak; Song Cheol Kim; Ki-Byung Song; Jae Hoon Lee; Dae Wook Hwang; Kwang-Min Park; Young-Joo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2014-11-30

8.  A new inflammation index is useful for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Feng Feng; Ying Huang; Qi Xun Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Role of Systemic Inflammatory Reaction in Female Genital Organ Malignancies - State of the Art.

Authors:  Michal Mleko; Kazimierz Pitynski; Elzbieta Pluta; Aleksandra Czerw; Katarzyna Sygit; Beata Karakiewicz; Tomasz Banas
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  The relationship between Glasgow Prognostic Score and serum tumor markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Gui Jiang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Yu Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.