Literature DB >> 20679783

Endoscope reprocessing methods: a prospective study on the impact of human factors and automation.

Cori L Ofstead1, Harry P Wetzler, Alycea K Snyder, Rebecca A Horton.   

Abstract

The main cause of endoscopy-associated infections is failure to adhere to reprocessing guidelines. More information about factors impacting compliance is needed to support the development of effective interventions. The purpose of this multisite, observational study was to evaluate reprocessing practices, employee perceptions, and occupational health issues. Data were collected utilizing interviews, surveys, and direct observation. Written reprocessing policies and procedures were in place at all five sites, and employees affirmed the importance of most recommended steps. Nevertheless, observers documented guideline adherence, with only 1.4% of endoscopes reprocessed using manual cleaning methods with automated high-level disinfection versus 75.4% of those reprocessed using an automated endoscope cleaner and reprocessor. The majority reported health problems (i.e., pain, decreased flexibility, numbness, or tingling). Physical discomfort was associated with time spent reprocessing (p = .041). Discomfort diminished after installation of automated endoscope cleaners and reprocessors (p = .001). Enhanced training and accountability, combined with increased automation, may ensure guideline adherence and patient safety while improving employee satisfaction and health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679783     DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3181e9431a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs        ISSN: 1042-895X            Impact factor:   0.978


  12 in total

Review 1.  Superbugs on Duodenoscopes: the Challenge of Cleaning and Disinfection of Reusable Devices.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Gerald McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

3.  Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk of infection transmission by duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Saurabh Sethi; Robert J Huang; Monique T Barakat; Niaz Banaei; Shai Friedland; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidance on Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes: Lessons Learned from Outbreaks, Infection Control.

Authors:  Isaac Benowitz; Heather A Moulton-Meissner; Lauren Epstein; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-08-01

5.  Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting.

Authors:  Lindy Forte; Cynthia Shum
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Infectious diseases linked to cross-contamination of flexible endoscopes.

Authors:  Nikki Kenters; Elisabeth G W Huijskens; Corianne Meier; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-08

7.  Worldwide practices on flexible endoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  N Kenters; E Tartari; J Hopman; Rehab H El-Sokkary; M Nagao; K Marimuthu; M C Vos; E G W Huijskens; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.887

8.  Recent update of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  Kyong Hee Hong; Yun Jeong Lim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31

9.  Simulated-use validation of a sponge ATP method for determining the adequacy of manual cleaning of endoscope channels.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Nancy Olson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 10.  Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care Facilities: An Overview and Current Issues.

Authors:  William A Rutala; David J Weber
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.