Saad F Jazrawi1, Bradley A Barth, Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. MC 9083, Dallas, TX 75390-9151, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While pancreatitis is uncommon in children, pseudocyst development can be a serious complication. Endoscopic drainage of pseudocysts is well established in adults. However, there are limited data regarding this procedure in a pediatric population. The objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pseudocyst drainage in children. METHODS: The study group included children (age <18 years) who presented for endoscopic drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts in whom endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed. In those cases with EUS guidance, a 19-gauge needle was used to access the pseudocyst and place a guidewire under fluoroscopic visualization. Needle-knife diathermy and balloon dilation of the tract were performed with subsequent placement of double pig-tailed stents for drainage. RESULTS: Ten children with mean age of 11.8 years (range 4-17 years) were analyzed for pancreatic pseudocysts due to biliary pancreatitis (n = 4), trauma (n = 2), familial pancreatitis (n = 1), idiopathic pancreatitis (n = 2), and pancreas divisum (n = 1). In eight cases, EUS-guided puncture and stent placement was successful. In the remaining two cases, aspiration of cyst fluid until complete collapse was adequate. As experience increased with EUS examination in children, the therapeutic EUS scope alone was used in 50% of cases for the entire procedure. In all ten cases, successful transgastric endoscopic drainage of pseudocysts was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts can be achieved safely in children. EUS guidance facilitates optimal site of puncture as well as placement of transmural stents.
BACKGROUND: While pancreatitis is uncommon in children, pseudocyst development can be a serious complication. Endoscopic drainage of pseudocysts is well established in adults. However, there are limited data regarding this procedure in a pediatric population. The objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pseudocyst drainage in children. METHODS: The study group included children (age <18 years) who presented for endoscopic drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts in whom endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed. In those cases with EUS guidance, a 19-gauge needle was used to access the pseudocyst and place a guidewire under fluoroscopic visualization. Needle-knife diathermy and balloon dilation of the tract were performed with subsequent placement of double pig-tailed stents for drainage. RESULTS: Ten children with mean age of 11.8 years (range 4-17 years) were analyzed for pancreatic pseudocysts due to biliary pancreatitis (n = 4), trauma (n = 2), familial pancreatitis (n = 1), idiopathic pancreatitis (n = 2), and pancreas divisum (n = 1). In eight cases, EUS-guided puncture and stent placement was successful. In the remaining two cases, aspiration of cyst fluid until complete collapse was adequate. As experience increased with EUS examination in children, the therapeutic EUS scope alone was used in 50% of cases for the entire procedure. In all ten cases, successful transgastric endoscopic drainage of pseudocysts was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts can be achieved safely in children. EUS guidance facilitates optimal site of puncture as well as placement of transmural stents.
Authors: Subhas Banerjee; Bo Shen; Todd H Baron; Douglas B Nelson; Michelle A Anderson; Brooks D Cash; Jason A Dominitz; S Ian Gan; M Edwyn Harrison; Steven O Ikenberry; Sanjay B Jagannath; David Lichtenstein; Robert D Fanelli; Ken Lee; Trina van Guilder; Leslie E Stewart Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Surender K Yachha; Kamal Chetri; Vivek A Saraswat; Sanjay S Baijal; Sadiq S Sikora; Richa Lal; Anshu Srivastava Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Evan P Nadler; Anna Novikov; Brian R Landzberg; Mark B Pochapin; Barbara Centeno; Thomas J Fahey; Nitsana Spigland Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Carlo Fabbri; Carmelo Luigiano; Andrea Lisotti; Vincenzo Cennamo; Clara Virgilio; Giancarlo Caletti; Pietro Fusaroli Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: K W Russell; D C Barnhart; J Madden; E Leeflang; W D Jackson; G P Feola; R L Meyers; E R Scaife; M D Rollins Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2012-12-29 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Maisam Abu-El-Haija; Soma Kumar; Jose Antonio Quiros; Keshawadhana Balakrishnan; Bradley Barth; Samuel Bitton; John F Eisses; Elsie Jazmin Foglio; Victor Fox; Denease Francis; Alvin Jay Freeman; Tanja Gonska; Amit S Grover; Sohail Z Husain; Rakesh Kumar; Sameer Lapsia; Tom Lin; Quin Y Liu; Asim Maqbool; Zachary M Sellers; Flora Szabo; Aliye Uc; Steven L Werlin; Veronique D Morinville Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Eric H Rosenfeld; Adam M Vogel; Mubeen Jafri; Randall Burd; Robert Russell; Marianne Beaudin; Alexis Sandler; Rajan Thakkar; Richard A Falcone; Hale Wills; Jeffrey Upperman; Rita V Burke; Mauricio A Escobar; Denise B Klinkner; Barbara A Gaines; Ankush Gosain; Brendan T Campbell; David Mooney; Anthony Stallion; Stephon J Fenton; Jose M Prince; David Juang; Nathaniel Kreykes; Bindi J Naik-Mathuria Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Ramit Mahajan; Ebby George Simon; Ashok Chacko; D Viswanath Reddy; P Rupesh Kalyan; A J Joseph; Amit Kumar Dutta; Sudipta Dhar Chowdhury; Reuben Thomas Kurien Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-03-05