Literature DB >> 23274700

Non-operative treatment versus percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in children.

K W Russell1, D C Barnhart, J Madden, E Leeflang, W D Jackson, G P Feola, R L Meyers, E R Scaife, M D Rollins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical course and outcomes of children with pancreatic pseudocysts that were initially treated non-operatively or with percutaneous drainage.
METHODS: A retrospective review of children with pancreatic pseudocysts over a 12-year period was completed. Categorical variables were compared using Fischer's exact method and the Student's t test was used to compare continuous variables. Analysis was done using logistic and linear regression models.
RESULTS: Thirty-six children met the criteria for pancreatic pseudocyst and 33 children were treated either non-operatively or with percutaneous drainage. Of the 22 children managed non-operatively, 17 required no additional intervention (77 %) and five required surgery. Operative procedures were: Frey procedure (3), distal pancreatectomy (1), and cystgastrostomy (1). Eight of the 11 children treated with initial percutaneous drainage required no additional treatment (72 %). The other three children underwent distal pancreatectomy. Success of non-operative management or percutaneous drainage was not dependent on size or complexity of the pseudocyst Logistic regression did not identify any patient demographic (gender, age, and weight), etiologic (trauma, non-traumatic pancreatitis) or pseudocyst characteristic (size, septations) that predicted failure of non-operative therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: In children, pancreatic pseudocysts can frequently be managed without surgery regardless of size or complexity of the pseudocyst. When an intervention is needed, percutaneous drainage can be performed successfully, avoiding the need for major surgical intervention in the majority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274700     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-012-3236-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  20 in total

Review 1.  Acute pancreatitis in childhood: analysis of literature data.

Authors:  Mony Benifla; Zvi Weizman
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Nonoperative management of blunt pancreatic injury in childhood.

Authors:  K Kouchi; M Tanabe; H Yoshida; J Iwai; T Matsunaga; Y Ohtsuka; H Kuroda; T Hishiki; N Ohnuma
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  The management of pancreatic injuries in children: operate or observe.

Authors:  Michael D Paul; David P Mooney
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Blunt pancreatic injuries in children: the role of percutaneous external drainage in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  J Bass; M Di Lorenzo; J G Desjardins; A Grignon; A Ouimet
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Percutaneous drainage of traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts in children.

Authors:  C Burnweit; D Wesson; D Stringer; R Filler
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1990-10

6.  Pancreatic pseudocyst in children: the impact of management strategies on outcome.

Authors:  Swee H Teh; Tuan H Pham; Adriana Lee; Penny L Stavlo; Angela M Hanna; Christopher Moir
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Todd H Baron; Gavin C Harewood; Desiree E Morgan; Munford Radford Yates
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Surgical management of the pancreatic pseudocyst in children: a long-term evaluation.

Authors:  G Karagüzel; M E Senocak; N Büyükpamukçu; A Hiçsönmez
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Pancreatic injury in children: good outcome of nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Ivo de Blaauw; J Tomas Winkelhorst; Paul N Rieu; Frans H van der Staak; Marc H Wijnen; Rene S V M Severijnen; Arie B van Vugt; Rene M H Wijnen
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria.

Authors:  A L Warshaw; D W Rattner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcome of radiological interventions in pediatric gastrointestinal diseases: A large tertiary center experience.

Authors:  Zaheer Nabi; Jagadeesh R Singh; Arafat Haris; Upender Shava; Radhika Chavan; Duvvur Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2018-12-27

2.  Identification of risk factors for pancreatic pseudocysts formation, intervention and recurrence: a 15-year retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital in China.

Authors:  Jie-Hui Tan; Lei Zhou; Rong-Chang Cao; Guo-Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.